Search for: "Matter of Levinson" Results 401 - 420 of 482
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Mar 2009, 3:43 am
  Unfortunately, potential clients are not.As Seth Godin writes (quoting Jay Levinson), the two best words to have on a billboard are, "next exit. [read post]
16 Mar 2009, 2:13 pm
That provision may well have been unconstitutional as a matter of due process even before Heller, as it seems to impose a punishment before conviction. [read post]
4 Mar 2009, 8:34 am
James Read, the author of the new University of Kansas Press book on John Calhoun, Majority Rule versus Consensus, has asked me to post the following comment, which I am happy to do:I would like to follow up on Sandy Levinson's post, "Does Calhoun still live? [read post]
14 Feb 2009, 11:56 am
This post is by my colleagues Gail Lees, Andrew Tulumello, Chip Nierlich, Mark Whitburn and Chris Chorba. [read post]
13 Feb 2009, 8:57 am
A Senior Justice shall also participate in any other matter before the Court including decisions to grant or deny a petition for certiorari or to promulgate rules of court in compliance with the rules enabling provisions of Title 28. [read post]
10 Jan 2009, 3:20 pm
  There was also the minor matter of talent, or rather me coming f2f with its absence. [read post]
22 Nov 2008, 7:58 am
Sandy Levinson has frequently criticized the gap between the election and inauguration as a poor example of constitutional design. [read post]
8 Nov 2008, 10:49 pm
Collins or, for that matter, John McCain, who I suspect will revert, after his disgraceful campaign that left so many people wondering why they ever admired him in the first place, to his earlier, and far better, self). [read post]
18 Sep 2008, 11:41 am
(Sandy Levinson discusses the article, too, nearby.) [read post]
19 Jul 2008, 2:59 pm
She demonstrates that constitutional choice matters, because under certain conditions, semi-presidentialism structures incentives that make democratic consolidation difficult or that actually contribute to democratic collapse. [read post]
13 Jul 2008, 6:28 pm
" Harvard law professor Mark Tushnet, like Levinson, has studied the 2nd Amendment. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 6:59 am
Let me say a few words about what that is.Sandy Levinson and I have noted previously that we are in the midst of the creation of a National Surveillance State, which is the logical successor to the National Security State. [read post]
8 Jul 2008, 6:49 am
Presumably this would mean that states now must, as a constitutional matter, have a doctrine of self-defense in their criminal and tort laws. [read post]