Search for: "Matter of Murphy v Murphy" Results 401 - 420 of 935
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 May 2010, 5:07 am by Kelly
Winn, 09-987 (downloads as a pdf) and Garriott v. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 7:37 am by Cian Murphy
However, in light of its grounding in EU law, the matter was referred to the ECJ. [read post]
23 May 2016, 3:22 am by Peter Mahler
— a dissenting shareholder appraisal case under BCL § 623 — and the Second Department’s 2010 decision in Matter of Murphy v U.S. [read post]
21 Mar 2017, 11:45 pm
| Book review: "Brandfather: John Murphy, The Man Who Invented Branding" | IP Summit 2016 (Second Part) | Around the IP Blogs! [read post]
17 Nov 2021, 5:14 am by Jack Goldsmith, Bob Bauer
But the Supreme Court’s invalidation of the legislative veto in INS v. [read post]
4 Jul 2012, 7:25 am by Susan Brenner
Quon, 130 S.Ct. 2619 (2010) ( `Although as a general matter, warrantless searches “are per se unreasonable under the 4th Amendment,” there are `a few specifically . . . exceptions” to that general rule.') (quoting Katz v. [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:58 am by Public Employment Law Press
Here, the two discrete acts alleged by the plaintiff were insufficient to create a hostile work environment (see Murphy v Department of Educ. of the City of N.Y., 155 AD3d 637, 639-640; Holtz v Rockefeller & Co., 258 F3d 62, 75 [2d Cir]). [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:58 am by Public Employment Law Press
Here, the two discrete acts alleged by the plaintiff were insufficient to create a hostile work environment (see Murphy v Department of Educ. of the City of N.Y., 155 AD3d 637, 639-640; Holtz v Rockefeller & Co., 258 F3d 62, 75 [2d Cir]). [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:58 am by Public Employment Law Press
Here, the two discrete acts alleged by the plaintiff were insufficient to create a hostile work environment (see Murphy v Department of Educ. of the City of N.Y., 155 AD3d 637, 639-640; Holtz v Rockefeller & Co., 258 F3d 62, 75 [2d Cir]). [read post]
3 Jun 2022, 10:58 am by Public Employment Law Press
Here, the two discrete acts alleged by the plaintiff were insufficient to create a hostile work environment (see Murphy v Department of Educ. of the City of N.Y., 155 AD3d 637, 639-640; Holtz v Rockefeller & Co., 258 F3d 62, 75 [2d Cir]). [read post]