Search for: "Matter of Said v Said"
Results 401 - 420
of 30,728
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Mar 2024, 10:29 am
But it didn’t matter. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 7:14 am
V. [read post]
20 Mar 2024, 6:16 am
The Court finds the plaintiff may proceed with his case even through his Article 78 was not successful.The case is Whitfield v. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 8:02 am
Kroh v. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 6:00 am
Citing Matter of Altieri v City of N.Y. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 6:00 am
Citing Matter of Altieri v City of N.Y. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 5:07 am
Clearly unconstitutional, the Court's doctrine has said. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 4:00 am
During the oral argument yesterday in Murthy v. [read post]
19 Mar 2024, 3:27 am
During oral argument in Murthy v. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 7:44 am
On my left: the edge of the off-ramp, a modest guardrail, and a fifty-foot drop. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 3:09 am
The Court of Appeal said that Mr. [read post]
17 Mar 2024, 10:34 am
Simply put, district courts seem free to ignore everything the Judicial Conference has said. [read post]
17 Mar 2024, 9:26 am
That would be certainly a possibility as not only the Berne Convention (Article 2(3)) mandates the protection of inter alia “other alterations of … artistic work”, but derivative works have been also held protectable under UK law (think of the famous Hyperion Records v Sawkins [IPKat here] as an example). [read post]
The Supreme Court Cannot Ignore the National Security Implications of the So-Called ‘Jawboning’ Case
17 Mar 2024, 6:00 am
That case is about the right of government officials to enforce the law and to speak out about matters of public concern. [read post]
16 Mar 2024, 9:31 pm
Sorting Fact From Fiction Murthy v Missouri started out as Missouri v Biden, a complaint filed with the US District Court for the Western District of Louisiana against President Joe Biden, several federal agencies, and government officials. [read post]
16 Mar 2024, 6:35 pm
After all, Missouri v. [read post]
16 Mar 2024, 4:05 pm
Barrett v. [read post]
16 Mar 2024, 4:04 pm
In the case of Adkins v. [read post]
16 Mar 2024, 6:16 am
The debate over what is often termed “jawboning” will come before the Supreme Court, which will hear arguments in Murthy v. [read post]
15 Mar 2024, 5:15 pm
"); ("Sutton didn't rule out the rule applying to past or ongoing matters"). [read post]
