Search for: "May v. Board of Directors" Results 401 - 420 of 4,822
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 May 2008, 7:20 pm
”The possibility that directors could lose their rights to indemnification or advancement after they leave the board may not only “surprise some practitioners,” but it would shock many directors, whom I believe rightly would be appalled to learn that they could be stripped of these rights after they leave the board. [read post]
11 Sep 2008, 7:00 pm
Instead, the Court is saying that it may be such conduct, but that it is necessary to develop the record more fully in order to make that determination. [read post]
18 May 2015, 3:00 am by Kevin LaCroix
  As readers will recall, as discussed here, in May 2014, the Delaware Supreme Court in the ATP Tour, Inc. v. [read post]
24 May 2012, 2:00 am by Keith Paul Bishop
Typically, corporate bylaws provide that officers serve at the pleasure of the Board of Directors and any officer may be removed, either with or without cause, by the Board of Directors. [read post]
20 Jan 2011, 3:16 am
Eligibility for unemployment insurance determined by the law in place at the time of the filing of a claim for benefitsDwyer v Commissioner of Labor, 273 A.D.2d 675In June 1997 the Unemployment Insurance Appeals Board ruled that former Orange County Personnel Director Joseph M. [read post]
23 Mar 2023, 12:55 pm by Kevin LaCroix
” However, in series of cases following the Delaware Supreme Court’s 2019 decision in Marchand v. [read post]
5 Aug 2010, 11:22 am
Directors holding nine other national board seats will be elected from SAG Branches outside Hollywood and New York. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 5:01 am by Devin DeBacker
President Biden’s May executive order on cybersecurity punted on the national cyber director’s formal legal role. [read post]
28 Jun 2011, 1:05 pm by David Jacobson
The role of a director is significant as their actions may have a profound effect on the community, and not just shareholders, employees and creditors. [read post]
28 Oct 2009, 5:00 am
  While the board may not have been apprised of certain risks, this may well have been because it wasn't told about the poision puts. [read post]
30 Apr 2011, 5:08 am
Court finds Pension Board's failure discontinue the payment of disability retirement benefits obviates the “suspension” of the retiree’s benefits Matter of Seiferheld v Kelly, 2011 NY Slip Op 03309, Court of Appeals New York City police officer James J. [read post]