Search for: "McDonald v. Justice Court" Results 401 - 420 of 911
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Mar 2011, 6:31 am by Daniel Bell
Ortiz of the University of Virginia’s Supreme Court Litigation Clinic reiterated that, in keeping with the “principle of parity” expounded in McDonald v. [read post]
10 May 2013, 1:35 pm by Ronald Collins
I hope the book offers readers a more nuanced view of the work of the Court and the Justices themselves. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 10:45 am by Marissa Miller
In the Wall Street Journal (subscription required), Ashby Jones examines Second Amendment litigation in the wake of the Court’s decisions in McDonald v. [read post]
23 Jun 2017, 4:25 am by Edith Roberts
In an op-ed in The New York Times, Linda Greenhouse looks at Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s opinion for the court in Sessions v. [read post]
16 Oct 2017, 7:59 am by emagraken
Grigg, 83 O.R. (3d) 161 the Ontario Court of Appeal reduced a jury’s $100,000 punitive damage award to $20,000 against a defendant driver whose blood alcohol level, at the time of the accident, was two to three times over the legal limit; ·       In McDonald v. [read post]
19 Jan 2022, 4:35 pm by Amy Howe
And Justice Clarence Thomas evoked Homer Plessy, the plaintiff in the landmark 1896 decision Plessy v. [read post]
12 Mar 2010, 6:50 am by Erin Miller
Florida and Sullivan v. [read post]
26 Jul 2010, 5:34 pm by Erin Miller
” In the Washington Post, Robert Barnes focuses on the dissent authored by Justice Stevens in McDonald and Justice Scalia’s concurring opinion in that case, characterizing them as the last in a series of intellectual “duels. [read post]
31 Aug 2010, 7:25 am by Anna Christensen
Finally, Eugene Volokh contrasts two recent Supreme Court decisions – McDonald v. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 4:50 am by SHG
Priddy, out of the Texas 2nd District Court of Appeals (Fort Worth), as reported at Liberty and Justice For Y'all. [read post]
10 Mar 2023, 4:30 am by Lawrence Solum
If Heller could have been characterized as a “minimalist” opinion at the time of its decision and McDonald v. [read post]
5 Feb 2014, 5:12 pm by Lyle Denniston
Heller, it ruled that the amendment protects a personal right to have a gun, at least for self-defense inside one’s home, and in 2010, in McDonald v. [read post]
5 Feb 2010, 7:59 am by Erin Miller
Tony Mauro at the National Law Journal (free registration required) reports this morning that James Feldman, a former Assistant to the Solicitor General who has argued forty-five times before the Supreme Court, will defend Chicago’s strict handgun ban in McDonald v. [read post]