Search for: "Merck "
Results 401 - 420
of 3,287
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Apr 2014, 3:44 am
In this 2-minute video, I run down 23 great ways that Merck enhances the usability of its 2014 proxy statement: Corp Fin Revises WKSI Waiver Policy Statement Again Last week, Corp Fin revised its policy statement concerning when it will grant a waiver of ineligible issuer status for WSKIs for the 2nd time over the past few months. [read post]
13 Aug 2009, 9:19 am
There are as many as 1,200 plaintiffs in state and federal cases, Merck says. [read post]
23 Nov 2011, 4:23 am
The civil settlement is tied to a broader range of allegedly illegal conduct by Merck, including statements about the cardiovascular safety of rofecoxib made by Merck representatives. [read post]
8 Feb 2008, 1:54 am
Attorney's Office for the District of Massachusetts is investigating whether Merck promoted Vioxx to health-care professionals for uses other than those approved by government regulators, a practice known as off-label marketing.Merck, one of the largest pharmaceutical manufacturers in the world, has so far declined to comment on the report of the investigation. [read post]
9 Sep 2009, 12:26 am
Earlier on Wednesday, Keenan rejected Merck's effort to dismiss 24 cases alleging that Fosamax causes jaw damage. [read post]
4 Jun 2008, 2:38 pm
Merck & Co, No. [read post]
8 Jan 2013, 12:45 pm
Merck trial. [read post]
6 Jun 2014, 1:59 pm
Merck as the next Fosamax Femur Fracture MDL case to be tried on May 5, 2014, but plaintiffs subsequently dismissed that case. [read post]
11 Aug 2009, 9:19 am
Merck and Boles disagree on when she developed her condition. [read post]
17 Sep 2007, 2:23 pm
Merck's irresponsible and duplicitous conduct endangered the health of New Yorkers and wasted our tax dollars. [read post]
14 Jun 2005, 9:57 pm
The news that the Supereme Court had issued its opinion in the matter of Merck Pharmaceuticals v. [read post]
15 Jul 2008, 7:15 pm
Merck fired a law firm it was happy with just to make sure a pro-corporate judge could hear their appeal... [read post]
30 Jan 2009, 12:36 am
” As of September 30, 2008, Merck had a reserve of approximately $4.649 billion related to the Vioxx litigation, including legal defense costs.For a copy of Merck's SEC filing, please click here. [read post]
30 Jun 2010, 4:51 am
Image via WikipediaFrom Bloomberg:Managers of Louisiana’s state-sponsored health programs had no power under state law to halt reimbursements for Vioxx prescriptions, even had they known that Merck misled them about the drug’s heart-attack risk, U.S. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 8:52 am
Three cases were previously tried in New York federal court, of which Merck won two and is appealing the loss of the third. [read post]
11 Aug 2009, 8:34 pm
That's what Merck has appealed to the Supreme Court. [read post]
31 Jan 2011, 7:18 am
Merck also manufactured Vioxx, the painkiller that was recalled because it allegedly caused thousands of deaths from heart problems and strokes. [read post]
4 Sep 2012, 5:04 am
Merck & Co. [read post]
8 Nov 2006, 10:00 am
Interesting article in today's Wall Street Journal: Merck Adds U.S., Canada Tax Disputes to Woes; Liabilities in Four Cases Could Total $5.58 Billion, by John Carreyrou Jesse Drucker:Merck Co. disclosed four separate tax disputes in the U.S. and Canada with... [read post]
11 Apr 2007, 5:54 pm
Article in the Wall Street Journal -- FDA's Position on New Drugs May Hurt Merck's Arcoxia Bid, by Jennifer Corbett Dooren. [read post]
