Search for: "Miner v Miner"
Results 401 - 420
of 2,326
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Nov 2020, 7:35 am
As it “is impossible to transfer rights to an assignee under an expired mineral lease,” in a case where oil, gas and mineral leases had expired prior to plaintiff’s acquisition of the property, the Louisiana Third Circuit Court of Appeal in Litel Explorations, L.L.C. v. [read post]
18 Nov 2020, 6:00 am
MTA Royalty Corp. v. [read post]
5 Nov 2020, 11:54 am
” See Miners v. [read post]
5 Nov 2020, 7:35 am
’s V 2.65% $5.3 billion deal to acquire Plaid Inc., a key player in the financial-technology space. [read post]
28 Oct 2020, 3:10 pm
Quoting from Stibling v. [read post]
21 Oct 2020, 7:28 am
Electric Light Co v. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 11:23 am
Marco Simons & MacKennan Graziano, Jam v International Finance Corporation: The US Supreme Court Decision and its AftermathMakbule Sahan, The First International Standard on Violence and Harassment in the World of WorkEmmanuel Umpula Nkumba, How to Reduce Conflicts Between Mining Companies and Artisanal Miners in the Province of Lualaba: Overcoming the Policy and Systemic Barriers to a Model that Respects Human Rights [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 12:12 am
As readers may recall, the General Court rendered a judgment around two years ago in the Asolo v Red Bull case (known under FLÜGEL – T-150/17 of 4 October 2018) ruling on similarity, or rather dissimilarity, between alcoholic and non-alcoholic beverages. [read post]
2 Oct 2020, 1:41 pm
Murray v. [read post]
30 Sep 2020, 11:01 am
Riverside County Transportation Comm. v. [read post]
Louisiana Legislature Calls Itself Into Second Extraordinary Session and Includes Certain Tax Issues
30 Sep 2020, 8:46 am
The Louisiana Legislature called itself into a second extraordinary session to address several issues confronting the state. [read post]
25 Sep 2020, 9:34 am
If I go grill after November, I’m gonna need one of those miners hat with the lights and kind of shining around to get anything cooked out there. [read post]
25 Sep 2020, 5:00 am
Co-author Rusty Tucker Jatex Oil & Gas, L.P. v. [read post]
22 Sep 2020, 9:48 am
However, the holder may have the following rights in relation to the surface of land: i) to enter the mining area and take reasonable measures on or under the surface for the purpose of mining operations; ii) to carry on mining operations and to do all such other acts and things as are necessary for carrying on of those operations; iii) to dispose of any mineral products… [read post]
6 Sep 2020, 4:21 pm
Mineral Pvt. [read post]
3 Sep 2020, 9:42 am
Hyder, and Burlington v. [read post]
3 Sep 2020, 8:03 am
Here are the materials in Fredericks v. [read post]
3 Sep 2020, 7:53 am
II(1),(2),(3) [3] Id.Art I and V [4] National Mineral Corporation Plc. vs. [read post]
2 Sep 2020, 5:14 am
After a four-week absence, they return to these pages, this time in DCP Sand Hills Pipeline, LLC v. [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 3:00 am
California et al. v. [read post]
