Search for: "Morris v. Goode" Results 401 - 420 of 793
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Jul 2011, 7:59 am by pete.black@gmail.com (Peter Black)
" http://j.mp/p3bT3R good question: "Study: why bother to remember when you can just use Google? [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 1:44 pm
No dictionaries were harmed (or even mentioned) in the construction of the claims, which can only be a good thing.PriorityMoving, then, to the question of priority (see [303] to [345]), the Judge referred to his own earlier opinion in Intervet UK v Merial [2010] EWHC 294 (Pat), which the parties agreed was an accurate summary of the relevant principles. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 6:34 am by John Elwood
 The Court also denied cert. without comment in Philip Morris USA Inc. v. [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 11:35 am by Ted Frank
It was generally viewed as a good sign for the Rule of Law when Justice Scalia stayed judgment in a Louisiana class action that ran roughshod over the due process clause in awarding $270 million for a smoking cessation program, and it was generally expected that, at a minimum, the Court would remand the case for reconsideration in light of Dukes, but, in a move that surprises me, the Court simply denied certiorari today, letting the verdict stand. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 7:09 am by Peter Rost
"These are legitimate concerns," concedes Lewis Morris, chief counsel for the Department of Health and Human Services’ unusually powerful Inspector General’s office, which is a key player in the search for ways to combat recidivism among pharmaceutical companies. [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 1:00 pm by McNabb Associates, P.C.
The committee has included an understanding in the resolution of advice and consent that addresses this point (see section V below). [read post]
21 Jun 2011, 5:00 am by Bexis
  His work truly lives on.There’s more good stuff. [read post]
17 Jun 2011, 7:36 am by Josh Sturtevant
"Only time will tell whether this is a good bet or not. [read post]
13 Jun 2011, 4:14 am by Marie Louise
Highlights this week included: Supreme Court affirms CAFC result but not ‘deliberate indifference’ standard: Global-Tech v. [read post]
8 Jun 2011, 10:00 pm by Rosalind English
Claims for conversion required that a party had title to sue, an unconditional demand for the goods or item’s return had been made, and such request had been refused or delivery of the item had failed. [read post]
25 May 2011, 3:50 pm
For a Tennessee case that contains a good discussion about the basic elements of the tort of intentional interference with contract, take a look at Buddy Lee Attractions, Inc. v. [read post]