Search for: "Moses v. Moses" Results 401 - 420 of 598
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Apr 2011, 1:41 am by Adam Wagner
Mosely’s lawyer offers some conspiracy theories today on Inforrm as to what has caused the current campaign against privacy. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 10:00 pm by 1 Crown Office Row
Justice Blake considered the relevant principles to be applied in relation to the PSEDs, as summarised in R(Boyejo & Ors) v Barnett LBC and Smith v Portsmouth CC [2009] EWHC (Admin) 755. [read post]
19 Apr 2011, 2:25 pm by NL
However, given intervention by the EHRC in the case, the Court of Appeal in Moses LJ’s lead judgment decided to set out the correct approach to s.24C and s.24D. [read post]
25 Mar 2011, 1:20 pm by Eugene Volokh
(Eugene Volokh) There’s been much talk about the trial court decision in Mansour v. [read post]
22 Mar 2011, 12:33 pm by Christopher Brown, Matrix.
The Supreme Court agreed that the 2002 Regulations discriminated indirectly, although the reasoning of Court was rather different from that of Moses LJ. [read post]
23 Feb 2011, 2:41 am by Adam Wagner
Lord Justice Moses said in a January 2010 ruling that he could not “leave this application without remarking upon the inability of this court to rectify what appears to be a serious injustice to Mr Mann”. [read post]
8 Feb 2011, 4:10 pm by INFORRM
  The point was dealt with by Moses LJ in this way: Tarsasag a Szasbadsagjogokert v Hungary (No 37374/05 14 April 2009) a landmark decision on freedom to information, on which Mr Eicke, for Mr Sugar, relied, establishes that article 10 may be invoked not only by those who seek to give information but also by those who seek to receive it (see also A v Independent News and Media Limited & Others [2010 EWCA Civ 343 [43] and [44]). [read post]
8 Jan 2011, 4:58 am by Charon QC
  However, the development of a right to privacy under cases such as Max Mosely v News of the World [2008] EWHC 1777 (QB) or Naomi Campbell v Mirror Group Newspapers [2004] UKHL 22 show that a privacy remedy made be available as a result of judicial intervention where no statutory remedy under the DPA is provided. [read post]
7 Jan 2011, 9:53 am by azatty
After all, “Our current system comes from Missouri, not from Moses. [read post]
23 Dec 2010, 2:12 am by Andrew Lavoott Bluestone
Ackerman, 280 AD2d 355 [lst Dept 2001J;s ee also Moses & Sinqer LLP v. [read post]
22 Dec 2010, 2:14 pm by Lloyd Duhaime
No matter what you do, if you get caught, ask for a sentencing circle. [read post]