Search for: "Motorola, Inc. " Results 401 - 420 of 676
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 May 2009, 2:20 pm
.), 722 F.2d 1063, 1071 (2d Cir.1983).Motorola, Inc. v. [read post]
19 Dec 2011, 2:04 pm
Reuters.com described the case as "a proxy for the larger fight for market share between Google Inc's Android cellphones and tablets, many of which HTC makes, and Apple's products. [read post]
16 May 2012, 5:19 am by Jenna Greene
Still Waiting: Google has waited and waited some more, unable to close its acquisition of Motorola Mobility until it obtains antitrust clearance from Chinese regulatory authorities. [read post]
20 Jun 2008, 11:35 pm
  Clear With Computers, Inc. was the Minnesota-based company founded by Jerome D. [read post]
8 Feb 2010, 4:45 am by traceydennis
& Anor v Inerco Trade SA [2010] EWHC 162 (Comm) (08 February 2010) High Court (Patents Court) Research In Motion UK Ltd v Motorola Inc [2010] EWHC 118 (Pat) (03 February 2010) High Court (Queen’s Bench Division) Ali v Associated Newspapers Ltd [2010] EWHC 100 (QB) (27 January 2010) Terry v Persons Unknown (Rev 1) [2010] EWHC 119 (QB) (29 January 2010) Debt Collect London Ltd & Anor v SK Slavia Praha- Fotbal A S [2010] EWHC 57 (QB) (02 February 2010) Webster & Ors… [read post]
12 Apr 2012, 12:47 pm by Adam Thierer
In fact it’s gone so far that it’s in the process of consolidation with probably two players dominating everything, Nokia Corp. and Motorola Inc. [read post]
4 Nov 2010, 8:31 pm by Kelly
(IPKat) Finland File-sharers to receive warning letters, but no 3 strikes (TorrentFreak) Germany German NPE confident of victory in dispute with Nokia and HTC (IAM) New Zealand 3 strikes still on agenda, but only if Kiwis keep on pirating (TorrentFreak) Sweden The paranoid anti-piracy group with no employees (TorrentFreak) United Kingdom Ministry of Sound forced to suspend file-sharing shakedown (TorrentFreak) United States US Patents – Lawsuits and strategic steps Apple – ALJ Bullock… [read post]
23 Mar 2011, 12:31 pm by Eric Schweibenz
As to related litigation, Microsoft states that it asserted the ‘780 patent against Motorola Mobility, Inc. by way of a patent infringement counterclaim in the U.S. [read post]
2 Apr 2010, 1:18 pm by Lyrissa Lidsky
Motorola, Inc., 105 F.3d 841 (2d Cir. 1997), to define the contours of the tort. [read post]
26 Feb 2010, 7:02 am by Eric Schweibenz
  Originally, Tessera named eighteen respondents in the complaint, but after the termination of several respondents based on settlement agreements, consent orders and defaults, the following Respondents remained in the investigation:  Acer, Inc., Acer America Corporation, Nanya Technology Corporation, Nanya Technology Corporation U.S.A., Powerchip Semiconductor Corporation, Elpida Memory, Inc., Elpida Memory (USA), Inc., ProMOS Technologies, Inc.,… [read post]
6 Aug 2007, 2:55 pm
The former SEC members' brief is opposed by the parties sued in the case -- Scientific-Atlanta Inc. and Motorola Inc. [read post]
23 Oct 2006, 8:32 pm
US Patent 6707351 - Motorola, priority March 27, 2002Claim 1 - "A microelectromechanical resonator comprising: a microelectromechanical resonant structure characterized by a mass and one or more selectively doped regions; a vaporizable material for altering the mass of the resonant structure. [read post]
25 Oct 2010, 10:32 am
" The suit named 19 defendants, including all of the major cell phone manufacturers and providers, as well as two trade associations: Nokia Inc.; Ericsson Wireless Communications Inc.; Motorola Inc.; Sprint PCS; Audiovox Communications Corp.; Nextel Communications; Panasonic Corp.; Philips Electronics North America Corp.; Qualcomm Inc.; Sanyo North America; Sony Electronics Inc.; AT&T Wireless Services Inc.; Verizon Wireless;… [read post]