Search for: "Mr. Arnold"
Results 401 - 420
of 1,688
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Feb 2016, 10:05 am
Mr. [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 7:02 am
John Arnold founded Centaurus Advisors with his last bonus from Enron – ~$8 million. [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 7:02 am
John Arnold founded Centaurus Advisors with his last bonus from Enron – ~$8 million. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 10:09 pm
Mr. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 1:51 pm
Mr. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 9:11 am
Mr. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 1:53 am
* English Patent Court speeds up, reminds Mr Justice Carr in Celltrion v BiogenCelltrion Inc. v Biogen Idec Inc., F. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 12:34 pm
Mr. [read post]
21 Feb 2016, 1:44 am
However, on the basis of the updated undertakings which lasted for the lifetime of the patent, Mr Justice Arnold granted the stay. [read post]
18 Feb 2016, 2:18 pm
Mr. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 12:19 am
As the AmeriKat was busy getting to grips with Mr Justice Arnold's decision in the latest Lilly v Actavis case (see here), she relied on the talented (and ever succinct) Eibhlin Vardy (A&O), to analyze the decision. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 1:48 pm
Mr. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 9:35 am
Mr. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 7:41 am
Mr. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 1:43 am
* Mr Justice Arnold foresees no infringing saline use in Actavis' pemetrexed futureIf you were at a loss as to what to get that special patent litigator in your life this Valentine's Day, look no further. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 9:14 am
Mr Justice Arnold has agreed to provide feedback to the presenters and select a final winner. [read post]
13 Feb 2016, 6:00 am
Mr. [read post]
12 Feb 2016, 7:59 pm
However, Mr Justice Arnold noted that he could not exclude the possibility that in a few years some pharmacists will decide to switch to saline. [read post]
12 Feb 2016, 5:02 am
He noted that in Hydropool Hot Tubs Ltd v John Roberjot [2011] EWHC 121 (Ch) Mr Justice Arnold had dispensed with service in a reasonably similar situation but noted that there were differences in the circumstances here including that Mr King was not in court when the injunction was issued, it was not clear whether Mr King has read the terms of the injunction when it was provided to him (although why this should allow him to avoid its terms is not clear)… [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 1:15 pm
Mr. [read post]
