Search for: "NAACP v. State" Results 401 - 420 of 763
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 May 2010, 5:49 am by Lawrence Solum
Justice Clark read his opinion for the Court in United States v. [read post]
16 Apr 2020, 6:00 am by Andrew Hamm
Doe 19-1108Issue: Whether the First Amendment and the Supreme Court’s decision in NAACP v. [read post]
18 Mar 2019, 7:31 pm by Steve Gottlieb
Then in 1952 the NAACP brought five cases to the Supreme Court challenging segregation and seeking to overrule Plessy v. [read post]
9 Jan 2009, 10:40 am
Mukasey, Attorney General Motion to affirm filed by appellees Intervenor-Appellees Texas State Conference of NAACP, et al. [read post]
12 May 2022, 10:03 am by Scott Bomboy
North Carolina State Conference of the NAACP The justices will decide whether North Carolina lawmakers may intervene in a lawsuit to defend the state’s voter-ID law because they disagree with the litigation strategy of the state attorney general, who is already representing the state, and what standard would allow lawmakers to intervene in the future. [read post]
9 Aug 2012, 6:19 am by J. Adam Engel
  This First Amendment check on government investigative activities was most famously explored in the United States Supreme Court in NAACP v. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 11:59 am
But just as a State may not deny rights protected under the Federal Constitution through pretextual procedural rulings, see NAACP v. [read post]
6 Mar 2012, 2:21 am by rhapsodyinbooks
It also enumerates the pressures on Marshall, who was simultaneously working on arguments for Brown v. [read post]
The decision stems from a lawsuit brought by the Arkansas State Conference NAACP and the Arkansas Public Policy Panel. [read post]
1 May 2020, 5:16 am by Public Employment Law Press
In some cases, however, the Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency may be a consideration.The Doctrine of Legislative Equivalency states that only the entity that created the position may abolish it [i.e., a position created by a legislative act can only be abolished by a correlative legislative act" (Matter of Torre v. [read post]