Search for: "NO PARTY v. NO PARTY"
Results 401 - 420
of 119,823
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jun 2007, 1:10 am
In the 1969 Presidential election when Indira Gandhi gave the call for conscience vote, resulting in the election of V.V.Giri, the Supreme Court held in Shiv Kripal Singh v. [read post]
3 Jun 2018, 4:58 pm
The discipline involved Groia’s defence in R. v. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 5:51 am
A few years ago, the Texas Supreme Court (all Republicans, by the way) explained that important role in the case of Roberts v. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 2:17 am
V. [read post]
7 Apr 2015, 2:17 am
V. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 8:00 am
A PoP post discussed this case, Thompson v. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 8:00 am
A PoP post discussed this case, Thompson v. [read post]
Eleventh Circuit Opinion Provides Insight into the Reach of Third-Party Title VII Retaliation Claims
25 May 2021, 12:06 pm
Tolar v. [read post]
15 Sep 2016, 3:36 pm
The recent case of Live Face on Web, LLC v. [read post]
22 Jun 2022, 4:15 am
The United States Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) on Tuesday announced that it has updated its interim guidance on the Director Review process under Arthrex v. [read post]
15 Sep 2016, 3:36 pm
The recent case of Live Face on Web, LLC v. [read post]
5 Apr 2022, 7:47 pm
In Graham v. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 8:59 am
One party to a collective bargaining agreement cannot compel arbitration of a dispute unless the agreement explicitly so providesMatter of Onondaga Community Coll. v Onondaga Community Coll. [read post]
30 May 2018, 12:01 pm
In today’s case (Karpowicz v. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 3:29 am
" Lebanon Seaboard Corporation v. [read post]
25 Jul 2007, 8:07 am
RHODES V. [read post]
3 Mar 2022, 1:34 pm
Jacoby v. [read post]
5 Dec 2023, 3:09 pm
R (UNISON) v. [read post]
12 Aug 2021, 4:00 am
The Appellate Division stated that it had consistently recognized that "the Board may adopt reasonable rules consistent with and supplemental to the provisions of the Workers' Compensation Law, and the Chair of the Board may make reasonable regulations consistent with the provisions thereof" (Matter of Randell v Christie's Inc., 183 AD3d 1057, 1059 [2020] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted].Those regulations require, in relevant part, that "an… [read post]
12 Aug 2021, 4:00 am
The Appellate Division stated that it had consistently recognized that "the Board may adopt reasonable rules consistent with and supplemental to the provisions of the Workers' Compensation Law, and the Chair of the Board may make reasonable regulations consistent with the provisions thereof" (Matter of Randell v Christie's Inc., 183 AD3d 1057, 1059 [2020] [internal quotation marks and citations omitted].Those regulations require, in relevant part, that "an… [read post]