Search for: "Nerds in Court"
Results 401 - 420
of 885
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Apr 2016, 5:46 pm
Details here.And here's one with a name we (appellate nerds) all recognize: Kurwa v. [read post]
6 Apr 2016, 11:35 am
The FBI’s reluctance to expose its investigative techniques to the world did not begin with the iPhone, I remind listeners; the Bureaus is fighting a court order demanding that it turn over its Tor exploit source code to a defendant in a child porn case. [read post]
6 Apr 2016, 3:53 am
From the outset of the debate over digital privacy, it was my view that the nerds didn’t “get” how the government, the courts, would deal with it. [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 11:35 am
Although a self-described nerd who therefore likes patents, he said that the most exciting thing that he did in 2015 was preside over the insolvency of the Lotus F1 team which was subsequently bought by Rennault. [read post]
1 Apr 2016, 10:22 am
” If anyone is still awake out there, our last new relist will be of greater interest to the non-nerd community. [read post]
25 Mar 2016, 6:24 am
Does NSA also have to explain in court exactly how it achieved the goal, or provide its experts for cross-examination? [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 5:46 pm
The Supreme Court found the decision to be within the FCC’s discretion. [read post]
14 Mar 2016, 3:08 pm
Attorney prepares (allegedly) "incomplete and incompetent" briefs that the Court of Appeal rejects. [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 10:02 am
Law nerds (that means both of our readers) take note: lost among all the headlines was the fact that the opinion contains great language about not construing ambiguous language to be jurisdictional. [read post]
9 Mar 2016, 2:24 pm
Federal Court nerds may possibly find this interesting. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 12:21 pm
Nerd alert! [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 3:23 pm
So even if you're not purely an Article III nerd, there is substantial evidence sufficient for appellate practitioners to attend. [read post]
25 Feb 2016, 9:00 am
It is clear, for example, that a lawyer must not knowingly assist a client to lie to the court or to others. [read post]
20 Feb 2016, 6:40 am
First, I gotta drop some organic-chemistry knowledge on y’all: Methyl tert-butyl ether (“MTBE”) (and for you IUPAC nerds: 2-Methoxy-2-methylpropane) is a gasoline additive that raises the octane number. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 12:21 pm
Photo courtesy of the United States Supreme Court. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 4:30 am
But defense drug and device law nerds will always have a soft spot in our hearts for Justice Scalia's opinion in Riegel v. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 6:08 pm
If I remember correctly, she won nationals in oratory, which was a big deal to us debate nerds back then. [read post]
3 Feb 2016, 6:00 am
Yes, we are Disney nerds. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 1:29 am
District Court in the Central District of California. [read post]
22 Dec 2015, 2:29 pm
Ten Books for the Supreme Court Aficionado in Your Life See also: Five Supreme Court Law Clerk Stories You Haven’t Heard BeforeStocking Stuffers for Brainiacs: A SCOTUS Kids' Book Collection [read post]
