Search for: "Nix v. Nix" Results 401 - 420 of 527
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
9 Dec 2010, 4:47 pm by Stephen Page
Federal Magistrate McGuire thought that the appropriate amount that the husband should receive was nought, nil, nix, zero or zip, or as the Full Court said:The effect of the order made by the Federal Magistrate was that the Husband only received his superannuation interest of $1,500.00 or 0.17 per cent of the net assets of the parties. [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 3:56 pm by sevach
Nuestro vínculo con él no es, pues, sólo científico; es también personal y, por tanto, definitivo, no sujeto a mutación como puede serlo una doctrina o una teoría”. 6. [read post]
12 Nov 2010, 6:43 pm by John Rizvi
Stethguard is a V-shaped clear plastic cover that protects the head of the stethoscope up to its neck, where most of the germs and bacteria are located. [read post]
20 Oct 2010, 6:47 am by On the Net
Supreme Court will hear the oral arguments in the case Garriot v. [read post]
14 Oct 2010, 4:45 pm by Colin O'Keefe
- Law firm consultant Cordell Parvin on his Law Consulting Blog Sale of Hancock Tower Completes Distressed Debt Turnaround - Boston attorney Matthew Clark of Dechert on the firm's blog, Crunched Credit Croft v. [read post]
12 Oct 2010, 3:13 pm by David Lat
As reported in the BLT, Steptoe employees testified that the meaty fumes were causing headaches, nausea, and watery eyes.In his ruling, Judge Mott — a member of the legal profession himself, of course — seemed to preemptively refute the whole “Big Bad Lawyers v. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 4:47 pm by Colin O'Keefe
- Trade Organizations Push for HFCS Flexibility - Portland corporate lawyer Tyler Anderson of Stoel Rives on the Food Liability Law Blog Decline of Damage Awards: Soost v Merrill Lynch - Toronto attorney Lisa Stam on her blog, Employment & Human Rights Law in Canada Oh right! [read post]
11 Sep 2010, 8:27 am by On the Net
On December 8, 2010, the United States Supreme Court will hear arguments in Chamber of Commerce v. [read post]
10 Aug 2010, 5:30 pm by Colin O'Keefe
- Columbus attorney Teri Rasmussen of Plunkett Cooney in her Ohio Practical Business Law Blog Classic Cases - Castano v. [read post]
17 Jul 2010, 6:39 pm by Carter Ruml
  It then reviewed general principles under § 61(a) and the bargain-sale rule of Comm’r v. [read post]