Search for: "No Respondents Named"
Results 401 - 420
of 30,645
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Dec 2015, 1:51 pm
His rather appropriate name is David J. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 2:57 am
www.udrpcommentaries.comPanels early recognized that complainant could likely not marshal conclusive proof that respondent lacked rights or legitimate interests in the domain name because the evidence was under the respondent’s custody and control. [read post]
9 Feb 2019, 10:45 am
Fenty’s business might respond: “Well, it’s his last name, too. [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 10:05 pm
No, actually, the name of the Canadian band is "Holy Fuck. [read post]
28 May 2013, 7:15 am
The confusion of the names of cases, what used to be called their “styles of cause”, is distressingly common. [read post]
18 Dec 2013, 11:30 am
This may not unreasonably be expected to cause some stress, not to mention palpitations, in the context of research and development collaborations and co-ownership, since the assignees whose names are not listed have no proof that the filing was done properly. [read post]
1 Apr 2009, 1:51 pm
Now he speaks out about it, and was named by samesame.com.au as one of Australia's leading 25 gays and lesbians for 2008. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 5:40 am
” The Panels concluded that respondents were using the names descriptively. [read post]
12 May 2010, 2:24 am
Although the Panel in Ammar Jarrous agreed that “the Respondent had made a convincing case to the effect that the Complainant should have known that the Respondent had a legitimate interest (in the sense of the Policy) in the disputed domain name,” he rejected the Respondent’s request because “he has not provided any evidence of malice aforethought or harassment by the Complainant in the sense of the Policy. [read post]
8 Mar 2019, 6:00 am
Russia responded by canceling a trip its foreign minister planned to take to Greece and expelling two Greek diplomats from Russia. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 2:19 am
The Panel noted that “[t]he Complainant made two principal assertions regarding bad faith: (i) that the Respondent registered the disputed domain name primarily for the purpose of disrupting the business of the Complainant; and (ii) that the Respondent registered the disputed domain name primarily in order to prevent the Complainant and/or the Complainant’s parent company from reflecting the mark FUTURIS in a corresponding domain name. [read post]
5 Nov 2015, 3:07 pm
Facebook has responded to an October 5 open letter from a global coalition, including EFF, about its broken “authentic name policy. [read post]
21 Jul 2014, 7:02 am
Appeared in the Toronto Star on July 19, 2014 as How Will Ottawa Respond to Court’s Reshaping of Privacy Law Canadian Internet and telecom providers have, for many years, disclosed basic subscriber information, including identifiers such as name, address, and IP address, to law enforcement without a warrant. [read post]
6 Sep 2016, 9:15 am
The actual driver of the vehicle responded to Sellers’ complaint by asking the court to dismiss the case because it was filed after the statute of limitations had expired. [read post]
6 Sep 2016, 9:15 am
The actual driver of the vehicle responded to Sellers’ complaint by asking the court to dismiss the case because it was filed after the statute of limitations had expired. [read post]
21 Jul 2010, 2:11 am
The Panel also finds that the transfer of the Domain Name to the Respondent, at that time called Genomatix Corporation, was made in good faith. [read post]
15 Jul 2010, 2:22 am
” While it was “not clear … exactly how the Respondent technically registered the domain name … it does seem clear that the registration was irregular, and that it was done without the permission of Complainant. [read post]
11 Oct 2019, 12:00 am
The panel accepted the respondent’s assertion that it had no notice of the YMOBILE mark prior to acquiring the disputed domain name. [read post]
18 May 2010, 2:21 am
A respondent’s history (not just in respect to domain name variations) is probative of bad faith. [read post]
28 Jan 2008, 11:24 am
In sharp contract, Respondent went to some lengths to respond to the Complaint and filed an affidavit in which its managing member deposed as to why he selected the domain name ('"Boomerang" is an ordinary word apt to indicate Australia as the geographic source of Respondent's vodka') and expressly denied Complainant's allegations. [read post]
