Search for: "O'Connor v. United States"
Results 401 - 420
of 472
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
19 Sep 2007, 8:10 am
United States and Boumediene v. [read post]
18 Sep 2007, 12:42 pm
Like Justice O'Connor, Justice Kennedy's commitment to any ideological world view is too fragile for either wing of the Court to have genuine confidence in the outcome of an entire Term's worth of cases. [read post]
23 Aug 2007, 1:00 am
O'Connor and other Cozen O'Connor attorneys who represented a winning slot license applicant. [read post]
22 Aug 2007, 12:22 pm
See, e.g., O'Connor v. [read post]
20 Aug 2007, 5:58 am
In Texas v. [read post]
30 Jul 2007, 3:56 am
United States v. [read post]
25 Jul 2007, 5:27 pm
To be sure, in United States v. [read post]
18 Jul 2007, 4:54 am
United States v. [read post]
11 Jul 2007, 10:27 am
Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O'Connor, said that she has never seen a time when the judiciary was subject to such universal criticism. [read post]
4 Jul 2007, 12:22 pm
United States v. [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 9:53 am
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 4:26 pm
The only relevant change was Alito for O'Connor. [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 4:26 pm
The only relevant change was Alito for O'Connor. [read post]
18 Jun 2007, 1:00 am
Supreme Court's 5-4 ruling last week in Bowles v. [read post]
7 Jun 2007, 12:16 pm
The granted issues in United States v. [read post]
6 Jun 2007, 12:31 pm
Balkin is probably right about the Court's theory (at least, about the theory of the Court whose decisions in Religion Clauses cases until recently depended on Justice O';Connor's vote). [read post]
30 May 2007, 1:03 am
That was back in January, and Diaz recently decided to move to Cozen O'Connor from Blank Rome. [read post]
23 May 2007, 1:02 am
O'Connor: Supreme Court Rulings Shouldn't Differ Based on Who Sits on Court
The Associated Press
Retired Justice Sandra Day O'Connor says the Supreme Court should generally follow its prior rulings so the public has confidence that laws do not change just because justices come and go. [read post]
18 May 2007, 2:50 pm
United States (1967); Flast v. [read post]
18 May 2007, 2:50 pm
United States (1967); Flast v. [read post]
