Search for: "OPINION OF THE JUSTICES TO THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES"
Results 401 - 420
of 3,690
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Dec 2022, 8:57 pm
” The justices’ discussion with Zachary Tripp (representing the creditor trying to protect its claim against Bartenwerfer) was not nearly so hostile. [read post]
6 Dec 2022, 7:20 am
House of Representatives. [read post]
6 Dec 2022, 5:01 am
House of Representatives in their personal capacities, filed suit against defendants including Donald Trump; Donald J. [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 4:29 pm
Chief Justice John Roberts was in attendance, as he has been often in the past, and a White House pool reporter’s dispatch indicated that the chief justice was shown briefly on the in-house screen applauding the presence of Paul Pelosi, the husband of outgoing House Speaker Nancy Pelosi and the victim of that vicious attack by a home intruder last month. [read post]
5 Dec 2022, 4:00 am
It does not take long for the court of public opinion to reach a decision even before your case sees a courtroom. [read post]
4 Dec 2022, 5:20 am
No. 93-854, 1 (May 16, 1974) (report accompanying S. 2543) (Comm. on the Judiciary).[2] This is, of course, typified by Justice Brandeis’ famous aphorism describing sunlight as the best disinfectant.[3] See, e.g., Brigham Daniels, Mark Buntaine, Tanner Bangerter, Testing Transparency, 114 NW. [read post]
2 Dec 2022, 1:06 pm
In January 2022, attorneys representing Hope filed a petition for writ of certiorari in the U, S. [read post]
2 Dec 2022, 4:54 am
They hold and express a diverse range of opinions on the law, its purpose, and its function in society. [read post]
2 Dec 2022, 3:00 am
Canada – Updated Lobbyists’ Code Awaits Approval from House Committee. [read post]
1 Dec 2022, 8:00 am
Donaldson) (February 16, 2017) White House Counsel Don McGahn, Memorandum - Presidential Records Act Obligations (February 22, 2017) National Archives, Letter to Deputy Why House Counsel Stefan Passantino (June 14, 2018) Deputy Assistant Attorney General, Office of Legal Counsel, Devin Debacker, “Responsibility for Electronic Presidential Records on Hardware of the Executive Office of the President After a Presidential Transition” (January 15, 2021) President Trump,… [read post]
28 Nov 2022, 6:27 pm
One other little tidbit: I found it interesting that in his opinion for the court, when discussing "the motivating principle of Auer deference," Judge Boggs cited a portion of Justice Kagan's Kisor opinion (Part II.A) that was only joined by three other justices, and thus represented a plurality opinion, not the opinion of the Court. [read post]
28 Nov 2022, 4:45 pm
(The other side of the debate is ably represented by Professor Mila Sohoni, whose work Frost also highlights.) [read post]
27 Nov 2022, 3:06 pm
Indeed, Section 1017 adds that the CFPB’s self-funded budget “shall not be subject to review by the Committees on Appropriations of the House of Representatives and the Senate,” nor subject to “the consent or approval of the Director of the Office of Management and Budget. [read post]
25 Nov 2022, 7:37 pm
Refused to let his mother in the house to help him. [read post]
25 Nov 2022, 2:37 pm
The ideal candidate for the Tribal Attorney will be trained and experienced in Federal Indian Law and Tribal law and will require minimal managerial supervision from the Executive Director and minimal legal mentorship to drive the Nation’s in-house objectives. [read post]
23 Nov 2022, 10:05 am
It is a remarkable gift of justice and fairness. [read post]
23 Nov 2022, 5:55 am
The Panel also advises individual States through legal opinions on draft legislation or legislation already in force. [read post]
21 Nov 2022, 11:10 am
” Chief Justice John Roberts, who wrote a concurring opinion arguing against the overturn of Roe and Casey, called the opinion “a serious jolt to the legal system. [read post]
21 Nov 2022, 5:16 am
Gerald Ford (R-Mich.) led an unsuccessful effort to impeach Supreme Court Justice William O. [read post]
20 Nov 2022, 9:01 pm
In a concurring opinion, Justice Clarence Thomas said that in future cases the Court should apply the reasoning of the Dobbs opinion to “reconsider all of this Court’s substantive due process precedents, including . . . [read post]
