Search for: "ORDER AMENDING THE RULES OF PROCEDURE FOR THE COURT" Results 401 - 420 of 10,269
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Nov 2017, 9:53 am by Cecere Santana, P.A.
However, the court noted that the attorney-client privilege was not implicated under these facts, and thus the court’s opinion did not technically rule on whether Amendment 7 preempted that privilege. [read post]
31 Jul 2008, 4:44 pm
The Nevada Supreme Court will consider proposed amendments to its Rules of Appellate Procedure on October 3rd. [read post]
28 Jun 2012, 5:35 pm by Cynthia L. Hackerott
In its federal court complaint, Frito-Lay asserts that the ARB’s order enforcing the OFCCP’s request for the additional (2008 and 2009) AAP data was contrary to agency norms and thus, violated the Administrative Procedure Act (APA) and the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment. [read post]
2 Mar 2015, 8:00 am by Steven G. Pearl
The trial court agreed, but the Court of Appeal reversed, concluding that these amendments "merely clarified existing law" and should apply retroactively to Satyadi's case. [read post]
17 Dec 2016, 1:26 pm by Gregory B. Williams
’s motion filed pursuant to Rules 59(e) and 15(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure seeking to (1) reopen the judgment of dismissal of the action previously entered under Rule 12(b)(6) for failure to state a claim and (2) to amend the complaint. [read post]
However, the ruling will not take immediate effect due to an April ruling from the US Supreme Court temporarily protecting access to the drug. [read post]
Guidance is in line with, but considerably more detailed and comprehensive than the amended Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, to take effect December 1, 2018. [read post]
10 Feb 2012, 8:48 am by Bill Raftery
He shall, with the concurrence of a majority of the supreme court justices, make rules governing the administration of all courts in the state and the practice and procedure to be followed in all such courts. [read post]
27 Jan 2012, 6:57 am by Tom Regan
The Utah Supreme Court recently approved a number of amendments to the Utah Rules of Civil Procedure which limit discovery in civil actions. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 7:05 pm by alexkorotkin
The Court Rules are promulgated by the Chief Administrator of the Courts on behalf of the Chief Judge of the Court of Appeals under the authority vested in them by Judiciary Law Sections 211(1)(b) and 212(2)(b), and by Article Six, Section 30, of the New York State Constitution, to adopt rules to regulate practice and procedure in the courts. [read post]
17 Jul 2012, 1:46 pm by Paul Rosenzweig
This appeals court order is a step in the process of determining whether AITs are lawful. [read post]
17 Oct 2014, 9:38 am
See Rule 11(a)(2) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. [read post]
16 Sep 2016, 8:25 am by Susan Hennessey
  The Supreme Court recently approved amendments to Rule 41. [read post]
2 Jun 2022, 5:16 am
In an Order that goes into effect on July 1, 2022, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court will put into place a new rule amending Pennsylvania Rule of Civil Procedure 1311.1 to change the maximum limit of what a plaintiff may elect as the value of damages that they can recover in a trial on appeal from an arbitration award.Under the current rule, that limit was set at $25,000.Under the new rule, the maximum limit will be changed to… [read post]
6 Apr 2021, 10:09 am by Alex Joel
For example, in ruling on an overseas surveillance issue, a district court stated: “[T]he Court does not take issue with the policies and procedures developed by the Executive Branch for foreign intelligence collection abroad. [read post]
12 May 2020, 11:52 am by Margaret Taylor
The amendment would require that electronic surveillance, use of a pen register or trap-and-trace device, production of tangible things, or targeting of U.S. persons for information can be done only pursuant to a warrant issued by a non-FISA federal court and only under the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 3:51 am
The Attorney General began his analysis by noting that in such matters the courts “have required strict compliance with Section 20.2,” citing Joyce v Ortiz, 108 AD2d 158.Section 20 of the Civil Service Law sets out the procedures to be followed by a local civil service commission or personnel officer wishing to amend its “personnel rules. [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 9:37 am by Rebecca Jeschke
EFF Will Appeal to Protect First Amendment RightsSan Francisco - A federal judge has unsealed her ruling that National Security Letter (NSL) provisions in federal law—as amended by the USA FREEDOM Act—don’t violate the Constitution. [read post]