Search for: "Ohio Civil Rights Commission" Results 401 - 420 of 769
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jun 2017, 6:50 am by Aurora Barnes
Colorado Civil Rights Commission 16-111 Issue: Whether applying Colorado’s public accommodations law to compel the petitioner to create expression that violates his sincerely held religious beliefs about marriage violates the free speech or free exercise clauses of the First Amendment. [read post]
8 Jun 2017, 10:36 am by John Elwood
Colorado Civil Rights Commission, 16-111, is now on its 12th relist, making it the second-most relisted case that I am aware of. [read post]
5 Jun 2017, 9:52 am by Amy Howe
Colorado Civil Rights Commission is presumably headed for its 12th relist. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 6:36 am by John Elwood
Colorado Civil Rights Commission, 16-111, now on its 11th relist, There Will Be Ink. [read post]
31 May 2017, 7:30 am by MBettman
The court held that “the right to due process under the Ohio Constitution requires that all children have the right to an amenability hearing before transfer to adult court. [read post]
31 May 2017, 4:59 am by Edith Roberts
In USA Today, Richard Wolf reports that the “decision to hear the case could signify that some of the Supreme Court’s more conservative justices believe Ohio and other states have a right to purge voters for not voting in several successive elections. [read post]
30 May 2017, 11:58 am by Amy Howe
Colorado Civil Rights Commission, will apparently be relisted for the 11th time. [read post]
30 May 2017, 8:19 am by Andrew Kent
A Civil War-era decision about military commission trials took center stage in the U.S. [read post]
26 May 2017, 9:24 am
Ohio 2008) (determining, on Government's summary judgment motion in civil forfeiture case, that residence in which Section 2251 and 2252 violations occurred was forfeitable). [read post]
26 May 2017, 6:29 am by John Elwood
Colorado Civil Rights Commission, 16-111 Issue: Whether applying Colorado’s public accommodations law to compel the petitioner to create expression that violates his sincerely held religious beliefs about marriage violates the free speech or free exercise clause of the First Amendment. [read post]
24 May 2017, 2:22 pm by Aurora Barnes
Colorado Civil Rights Commission 16-111 Issue: Whether applying Colorado’s public accommodations law to compel the petitioner to create expression that violates his sincerely held religious beliefs about marriage violates the free speech or free exercise clauses of the First Amendment. [read post]
12 May 2017, 6:15 am by Jim Sedor
There is nothing illegal about giving these donations to a politician, said Jessica Levinson, president of the Los Angeles Ethics Commission. [read post]
4 May 2017, 9:30 pm by Justin S. Daniel
Securities and Exchange Commission by a vote of 61-37. [read post]
13 Apr 2017, 2:47 pm by Mays & Kerr LLC
While much has been reported in the news recently in terms of bathrooms and civil rights, an Ohio public health agency employee’s Title VII lawsuit was a very different kind of bathroom case. [read post]
7 Apr 2017, 12:38 pm by Jordan Brunner
Ohio Elections Commission (along with the Federalist Papers), Twitter argues that the First Amendment protects a right to pseudonymous speech. [read post]
27 Mar 2017, 6:41 am
The reason is that Ohio’s “Good Funds Law”, Ohio Revised Code Section 1349.21 was amended as part of Ohio HB 463 signed in December of last year. [read post]
14 Feb 2017, 12:00 am by alysondrake
King and hundreds of civil rights activists in the historic civil rights campaign in Georgia [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 4:25 am by Jon Hyman
Requires individuals to elect between filing an administrative charge with the Ohio Civil Rights Commission or filing a discrimination lawsuit in court, with the filing of the former tolling the statute of limitations for the latter. [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 4:25 am by Jon Hyman
Requires individuals to elect between filing an administrative charge with the Ohio Civil Rights Commission or filing a discrimination lawsuit in court, with the filing of the former tolling the statute of limitations for the latter. [read post]
On October 20, 2016, the Department of Justice (“DOJ”) and the Federal Trade Commission (“FTC”) jointly issued their “Antitrust Guidance for Human Resource Professionals. [read post]