Search for: "Old Chief v. United States"
Results 401 - 420
of 1,777
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Sep 2020, 10:04 am
More pointedly, it provides (in §606(c)) that: Upon proclamation by the President that there exists war or a threat of war, or a state of public peril or disaster or other national emergency, or in order to preserve the neutrality of the United States, the President, if he deems it necessary in the interest of national security or defense, may suspend or amend, for such time as he may see fit, the rules and regulations applicable to any or all stations or devices… [read post]
31 Aug 2020, 2:05 pm
And I was representing the United States as an amicus to Ohio, and I had not actually written the briefs in this case. [read post]
27 Aug 2020, 9:22 am
Simpson v. [read post]
23 Aug 2020, 7:49 pm
(as he then was) stated in Collins v. [read post]
20 Aug 2020, 12:31 pm
” Section 201(a)(1) defines this category to include members of Congress, as well as “an officer or employee or person acting for or on behalf of the United States. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 8:49 am
De Simone v. [read post]
4 Aug 2020, 6:30 am
Putting in question the state power of eminent domain certainly seemed to go nowhere, but I think there is an argument to be made with respect to Rehnquist Court’s federalism decisions having a highly consequential doctrinal and policy payoff under Chief Justice Roberts. [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 11:47 am
” Prosecutors later initiated the civil forfeiture action of United States v. [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 11:47 am
"Prosecutors later initiated the civil forfeiture action of United States v. [read post]
3 Aug 2020, 11:47 am
” Prosecutors later initiated the civil forfeiture action of United States v. [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 11:54 am
Walker embraces a fringe legal theory that would count six very old resolutions from states that sought an Article V convention without specifying a particular purpose. [read post]
31 Jul 2020, 7:20 am
The former group tends to see in Holmes a captivating idealist; the latter group may see nothing but a cranky old man. [read post]
30 Jul 2020, 6:30 am
Holder, which advanced the false assertion that voters of color are no longer subject to systematic efforts to suppress their votes; Citizens United v. [read post]
25 Jul 2020, 12:21 am
Two months ago, the Supreme Court decided a similar case, South Bay United Pentecostal Church v. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 12:19 pm
Written by Chief Justice Roger Brooke Taney, whose bust sits inside the entrance to the Old Supreme Court Chamber in the United States Capitol, this opinion declared that African Americans were not citizens of the United States and could not sue in Federal courts. [read post]
23 Jul 2020, 8:00 am
United States, No. 19-3071 (7th Cir. 2020). [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 7:38 am
In State v. [read post]
21 Jul 2020, 9:01 pm
Constitution treats Native tribes as what Chief Justice John Marshall described in the 1831 case of Cherokee Nation v. [read post]
14 Jul 2020, 11:14 am
"] From today's decision in State v. [read post]
13 Jul 2020, 6:30 am
United States, the Court held that new Fourth Amendment precedent must apply retroactively. [read post]
