Search for: "Other Defendants-Class III-a, Class III-b, Class III-c"
Results 401 - 420
of 473
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Sep 2009, 1:27 am
III. [read post]
10 Sep 2009, 1:27 am
III. [read post]
16 Jul 2009, 2:37 am
Gless, Frederic B. [read post]
18 Jun 2009, 4:44 pm
Certification under the Class Proceedings Act requires that a number of requirements described at section 5(1) of the Act be present: 5(1) The court shall certify a class proceeding on a motion under section 2, 3 or 4 if,(a) the pleadings or the notice of application discloses a cause of action;(b) there is an identifiable class of two or more persons that would be represented by the representative plaintiff or… [read post]
11 Jun 2009, 11:19 pm
" Indiana Code § 34-49-3-3(b). [read post]
2 Jun 2009, 5:00 am
Challener and John B. [read post]
27 May 2009, 1:23 pm
Customer Data Security Breach Litigation,(C.A.1 (Me.))Removal - Class action brought against stores in Florida qualified for remand to state court under the "home state exception" CAFA.As a matter of first impression, the Court of Appeals for the First Circuit held that a class action brought against grocery stores in Florida qualified for remand to the state court under the "home state exception" to the Class Action Fairness Act. [read post]
22 May 2009, 2:34 am
Among other things, the complaint alleges that: (a) The Company's assets, including loans and mortgage-related securities were impaired to a greater extent than the Company had disclosed; (b) Defendants failed to properly record losses for impaired assets; (c) The Company's internal controls were inadequate to prevent the Company from improperly reporting its impaired assets; and (d) The Company's capital base was not as well capitalized… [read post]
29 Apr 2009, 2:06 am
Goodman has been represented by Alan C. [read post]
14 Apr 2009, 4:54 am
The court that sentenced the defendant to a judicially sanctioned
drug treatment program may on its own motion, or on the defendant's
motion, ord [read post]
7 Apr 2009, 9:59 am
b. [read post]
12 Mar 2009, 2:15 am
The complaint alleges that On November 6, 2008, the beginning of the Class Period, defendants reported the "fair value" of Perrigo’s ARS as $14,500,000, but concealed the impact of Lehman’s bankruptcy on Perrigo’s ARS. [read post]
20 Feb 2009, 5:00 am
EPO to make IPscore available for free (BLOG@IPJUR::COM) Help from the OHIM: CTM e-filing: program compatibility issues (Class 46) European qualifying examinations (EQEs) and languages (IPKat) Applications for geographical indications (GI) and protected designation of origins: BŘEZNICKÝ LEŽÁK, for Czech beer(GI) ; HAJDÚSÁGI TORMA, for Hungarian horseradish (PDO); Faba de Lourenzá for Spanish beans (GI);… [read post]
18 Feb 2009, 7:56 pm
C. [read post]
14 Feb 2009, 11:56 am
Part III highlights key class action decisions from 2008. [read post]
1 Dec 2008, 11:23 am
Tompkins will need to file a new petitionnow that his exhaustion has been completed in order toobtain a ruling as to whether any of the other grounds (II,III, and V) fit within the decision in Panetti v.Quarterman, 127 S. [read post]
22 Nov 2008, 4:10 pm
"B. [read post]
16 Oct 2008, 6:10 pm
[ILB Note] Although the opinion indicates "BAKER, C. [read post]
15 Sep 2008, 8:29 pm
Moore, No. 07-3770 Sentence for convictions on federal drug charges is affirmed over defendant's equal-protection argument that he was a "class of one" subjected to a federal mandatory-minimum sentence, whereas similarly-situated defendants charged in state court faced no such minimum. .. [read post]
29 Aug 2008, 6:23 pm
Trial Rule 12(B)(6). [read post]
