Search for: "Oxley, in Re"
Results 401 - 420
of 475
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
30 Jul 2007, 10:53 am
"There doesn't seem to be consensus, and they're determined to seek broad comment. [read post]
29 Dec 2009, 5:20 pm
So we're really not having discussions with anybody. [read post]
13 May 2011, 10:25 am
Res. 250 called on the House of Representatives to congratulate and commend Free Comic Book Day. [read post]
11 May 2012, 8:20 am
Keeping an ethical wall between trades and analysts is fundamental – and, ever since Sarbanes-Oxley 2002, has been legally mandatory in the US, so if any of these traders were doing business in America, they’re looking at jail. [read post]
26 Oct 2008, 5:58 am
"They're both GAAP numbers . . . [read post]
7 Sep 2012, 6:23 am
Sham governance, cronyism, and meddling In Part 1, I mocked the faint praise BCG struggled to bestow upon NYCHA’s board: If 90% of life is just showing up, then NYCHA must be scoring 90% The absence of achievements is bad enough – more damning still is this exposition of how the board is wrongly constituted: We’re not a board, we’re a cabal – and what’s wrong with that? [read post]
11 Nov 2008, 9:46 pm
They're sitting there with huge piles of money. [read post]
31 Dec 2006, 5:46 pm
You're there. [read post]
17 Aug 2016, 5:03 pm
But not if you’re working for one of Britain’s EU-hating newspapers, particularly when in full Brexit propagandist flow. [read post]
29 Jun 2007, 10:04 am
"We're still actively engaged in discussions," he said. [read post]
12 Aug 2022, 3:09 pm
Sec. 1519 was originally enacted in the wake of the Enron and Worldcom corporate scandals as part of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. [read post]
26 Nov 2009, 7:15 pm
Patrick Byrne, former CFO David Chidester, and present CFO Steve Chesnut have all signed Sarbanes-Oxley certifications that later turned out to be false. [read post]
2 Aug 2011, 9:59 am
The Sarbanes-Oxley Act is a law to be enforced. [read post]
17 Dec 2009, 6:33 am
” In re Caremark International Inc. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 10:39 am
An when you're done writing all this down, we're going to put it up on the internet where the other side can read all of your thoughts about these cases. [read post]
28 Jan 2009, 9:40 am
The Friehling & Horowitz firm was not registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board ("PCAOB"), because of an overbroad exemptive rule (discussed below) that the SEC repeatedly adopted in the wake of Sarbanes-Oxley to spare broker-dealers that were not publicly held from the oversight of a PCAOB-registered auditor. 2. [read post]
21 Nov 2009, 4:14 pm
The letter also notified the company that the filing did not contain the certifications required under sections 302 and 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. [read post]
19 Sep 2014, 5:22 am
Finance lawyers churn out position papers dismantling the logic of Dodd-Frank, Basel, Sarbanes-Oxley, etc. [read post]
15 May 2019, 7:21 pm
I am delighted to announce the publication of "Next Generation Law: Data-Driven Governance and Accountability Based Regulatory Systems in the West, and Social Credit Regimes in China," Law &: Southern California Interdisciplinary Law Journal 28(1): 123-172 (2018).In the contemporary world, compliance systems and policing are quickly replacing law and the traditional methods of enforcement (either organic or positive law) as the framework through which collectives (the state, the… [read post]
5 Jul 2015, 3:28 pm
Discussion As required by the Dodd-Frank Act, these proposed rules are considerably broader than the existing executive compensation clawback requirements under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. [read post]
