Search for: "P. S. & S., Inc. v. Superior Court" Results 401 - 420 of 608
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
3 Nov 2010, 5:05 pm by Steven G. Pearl
Regarding plaintiffs' "derivative" claims (LC 226, LC 203, and B&P 17200), the court held:With respect to these three subclasses, the Court finds that common issues predominate. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 1:22 pm by Bexis
 But we guess it bears repeating.The Supreme Court held in Day & Zimmerman, Inc. v. [read post]
10 Sep 2010, 8:07 am by Bexis
Superior Court, 79 P.3d 556, 563 (Cal. 2003).Lower California courts, but not the California Supreme Court, have cited Restatement Third §2 with approval. [read post]
27 Aug 2010, 2:41 pm by Bexis
  In the drug area, as we reported before, the Pennsylvania Superior Court thoroughly killed the concept in Lance v. [read post]
15 Aug 2010, 8:40 pm by Josh Wright
Superior Court, supra, 114 Cal.App.4th 309, 330.) [read post]
12 Aug 2010, 10:12 am by Steven G. Pearl
AnimalFeeds Int'l Corp. supra, 559 U.S. at p. ---- [130 S.Ct. at pp. 1774-1775] [consent]; T.Co Metals v. [read post]
9 Aug 2010, 10:33 am
  In denying Elrac's motion, Queens County Supreme Court Justice Devin P. [read post]