Search for: "PARKS V. CITIZENS PROPERTY"
Results 401 - 420
of 587
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Mar 2012, 8:40 am
Park St., Ste. 207, Lebanon, NH 03766. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 10:17 am
Draw in social scientists to engage with the implications of this development and with the impact that unauthorized uses might have on us as citizens, consumers, speakers. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 9:04 pm
., v. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 12:12 pm
This jurisdictional crowding results in inefficient use of government resources and creates uncertainty and confusion for industry, developers and citizens. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 1:30 am
Newly resolved cases include: Nathaniel Rothschild v The Observer (Clause 1) 10/02/2012; A man v Grimsby Evening Telegraph (Clause 1) 08/02/2012; A woman v Hinckley Times (Clause 1) 08/02/2012; Ellen Yianni v Daily Mail (Clause 1) 08/02/2012; Nathalie Dye v Daily Mail (Clause 1 and 5) 08/02/2012; Nathalie Dye v The Sun (Clause 1 and 5) 08/02/2012. [read post]
12 Feb 2012, 8:30 am
Rosenberger v. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 10:04 am
The First District recently brought further clarity to the baseline setting rules in such contexts, as well as the public trust doctrine, in its published opinion in Citizens for East Shore Parks v. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 7:51 am
Kelo greatly shook every property owner’s security in this fundamental right; it is now time for state legislatures to respond accordingly to re-instill confidence for every citizen. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 10:32 pm
CIO, we find property that has “immemorially” been open to the public and since “time out mind . . .used for purposes of assembly, communicating thoughts between citizens, and discussing public questions. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 1:27 pm
"We agree as to one" i.e. that the land exchange violated the Land and Water Conservation Fund Act regarding the market-value provision of the Act requires the substitute "recreation properties" to have "at least equal fair market value" as the leased park. [read post]
25 Jan 2012, 7:00 am
In Yee v. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 11:32 am
The Supreme Court ruling in United States v. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 1:36 pm
Supreme Court’s landmark decision in Citizens United v. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 5:01 am
Parity for exclusion from income for employer-provided mass transit and parking benefits (sec. 132(f))28. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 6:30 am
Yet the Court denies review of these cases as well, most recently this term in West Linn Corporate Park v. [read post]
10 Dec 2011, 6:20 am
For the facts, see United States v. [read post]
6 Dec 2011, 12:01 am
Citizen, 541 U.S. 752 (2004) and Vt. [read post]
3 Dec 2011, 1:46 pm
The state does have a significant interest in safeguarding public safety and property. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 11:32 am
On December 7, the Court will hear argument in PPL Montana, LLC v. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 11:06 am
Imagine you parked your car in a parking lot, and you later came back and found someone underneath your car just hanging out. [read post]