Search for: "PARKS V. CITIZENS PROPERTY" Results 401 - 420 of 587
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Mar 2012, 10:17 am by Rebecca Tushnet
  Draw in social scientists to engage with the implications of this development and with the impact that unauthorized uses might have on us as citizens, consumers, speakers. [read post]
15 Feb 2012, 12:12 pm by Dianne Saxe
This jurisdictional crowding results in inefficient use of government resources and creates uncertainty and confusion for industry, developers and citizens. [read post]
13 Feb 2012, 1:30 am by INFORRM
Newly resolved cases include: Nathaniel Rothschild v The Observer (Clause 1) 10/02/2012; A man v Grimsby Evening Telegraph (Clause 1) 08/02/2012; A woman v Hinckley Times (Clause 1) 08/02/2012; Ellen Yianni v Daily Mail (Clause 1) 08/02/2012; Nathalie Dye v Daily Mail (Clause 1 and 5) 08/02/2012; Nathalie Dye v The Sun (Clause 1 and 5) 08/02/2012. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 10:04 am by Arthur F. Coon
  The First District recently brought further clarity to the baseline setting rules in such contexts, as well as the public trust doctrine, in its published opinion in Citizens for East Shore Parks v. [read post]
9 Feb 2012, 7:51 am by My name
Kelo greatly shook every property owner’s security in this fundamental right; it is now time for state legislatures to respond accordingly to re-instill confidence for every citizen. [read post]
8 Feb 2012, 10:32 pm by Marc Blitz
CIO, we find property that has “immemorially” been open to the public and since “time out mind . . .used for purposes of assembly, communicating thoughts between citizens, and discussing public questions. [read post]
26 Jan 2012, 1:27 pm by WIMS
"We agree as to one" i.e. that the land exchange violated the Land and Water Conservation Fund Act regarding the market-value provision of the Act requires the substitute "recreation properties" to have "at least equal fair market value" as the leased park. [read post]
23 Jan 2012, 11:32 am by Steve Hall
The Supreme Court ruling in United States v. [read post]
4 Jan 2012, 5:01 am by James Edward Maule
Parity for exclusion from income for employer-provided mass transit and parking benefits (sec. 132(f))28. [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 6:30 am by Kevin Russell
Yet the Court denies review of these cases as well, most recently this term in West Linn Corporate Park v. [read post]
3 Dec 2011, 1:46 pm by Edward A. Fallone
The state does have a significant interest in safeguarding public safety and property. [read post]
1 Dec 2011, 11:32 am by Thomas Merrill
On December 7, the Court will hear argument in PPL Montana, LLC v. [read post]
27 Oct 2011, 11:06 am by Orin Kerr
Imagine you parked your car in a parking lot, and you later came back and found someone underneath your car just hanging out. [read post]