Search for: "PENN v. PENN." Results 401 - 420 of 1,871
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jun 2017, 2:56 am by Walter Olson
“Trump promises ‘massive permit reform’ in infrastructure bill” [Melanie Zanona, The Hill] Murr v. [read post]
23 Nov 2010, 7:08 am by Jessie Canon
“We are delighted to welcome these distinguished constitutional experts as NCC-Penn Law visiting scholars,” said Penn Law Dean Michael A. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 8:00 am by Dan Ernst
Smith, America's Most Important Piracy Case, which was published in Penn State Journal of Law and International Affairs 1 (2012): 320-62. [read post]
6 Apr 2009, 3:39 am
A couple of decisions, though nothing major, from the banks of the Potomac:   in 14 Penn Plaza v. [read post]
22 Apr 2009, 4:15 am
In response, the employer moved to compel arbitration.This 5 to 4 decision reversed the Second Circuit's decision that held that its decision in Alexander v Gardner-Denver Co., 415 U. [read post]
18 Jul 2017, 8:50 am by The Federalist Society
The question before the United States Supreme Court was whether, in a regulatory taking case, the “parcel as a whole” concept as described in Penn Central Transportation Company v. [read post]
30 Oct 2017, 4:16 pm by Sabrina I. Pacifici
The study, which relies on the Penn Wharton Budget Model (PWBM), found that the deficit would increase by $1 trillion to $3.5 trillion over the course of the first decade, based on differing estimates of how the final plan will look. [read post]
11 Nov 2009, 1:34 pm by JB
Penn's PENNumbra is hosting a debate between David Rivkin, Lee Casey, and myself on whether the individual mandate in President Obama's health care plan is constitutional. [read post]
17 Nov 2010, 7:11 pm by Lawrence B. Ebert
**Also**Nick Morelli: I can't ask questions I don't know the answers to, that's lawyering 101.In the Whitten case (the episode is captioned: Whitten v. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 12:01 am by Robert Thomas (inversecondemnation.com)
The brief argues: Although Amici agree that the Ninth Circuit decision below completely misconstrued this Court’s decision in Palazzolo, the Ninth Circuit was able to do this end-run of Palazzolo because of the underlying incoherence in the test that was first set out in Penn Central Transportation Co. v. [read post]