Search for: "PETERS v. HOLDER"
Results 401 - 420
of 481
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jan 2023, 7:30 am
The only no vote was by Peter Yates of New York. [read post]
2 Mar 2021, 3:31 am
The Court of Justice will, in due course, have to issue a ruling in Nokia v Daimler – and that looming dispute certainly haunts the group’s report. [read post]
7 Jun 2020, 12:17 pm
” Yessenow v. [read post]
23 Feb 2013, 11:45 am
By virtue of having followed the Microsoft v. [read post]
4 Sep 2022, 4:15 pm
As IPKat explains, Kelis is not the rights holder of the song: her problem is with her producers, not Beyoncé. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 1:37 am
Citizens United v. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 1:43 am
Or that the credibility of the technical effect is assessed at the priority or filing date (e.g., TGI Paris, October 6, 2009, RG n°07/16446, Teva v. [read post]
7 May 2018, 10:25 pm
Collyard, Robins Kaplan LLP, pro hac vice, Peter C. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 2:39 pm
For example, Lee cites Justice Grier's dissent in O'Reilly v. [read post]
21 Nov 2012, 4:00 am
Late last Friday evening, a policy brief written by 24 year old Derek Khanna was posted to the website for the Republican Study Committee (RSC), a caucus of conservative House Republicans. [read post]
3 Feb 2008, 10:42 pm
Their views appear to greatly differ from those of Bebchuk's, who proposes allowing shareholders to alter "rules-of-the-game" decisions or else elect a new team of directors who will.[3] This report will use Bainbridge, Blair and Stout's theories in support of an amendment seeking to expand the rule's exclusions regarding shareholder proposals to limit shareholders' input dealing with elections in general, while Bebchuk's theories will be relied upon to… [read post]
17 Apr 2017, 1:26 pm
In the United States that might mean the enterprise embedded within society; in Japan, it might suggest an enterprise embedded in itself and then society—that is, of corporations as autonomous and independent entities capable of self-ownership.[11] As a societal actor, the autonomy of the enterprise is privileged over the property rights of its equity holders. [read post]
10 Apr 2018, 2:40 pm
In the United States, that might mean the enterprise embedded within society; in Japan, it might suggest an enterprise embedded in itself and then society—that is, corporations are autonomous and independent entities capable of self-ownership.13 As a societal actor, the autonomy of the enterprise is privileged over the property rights of its equity holders. [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 7:55 am
Opening Remarks: Henry Smith—exploring the connections between private law and IP. [read post]
17 Sep 2015, 2:46 pm
(2) Campbell v. [read post]
31 Aug 2014, 12:49 pm
In dissent in Petrella v. [read post]
11 Aug 2021, 3:21 pm
Did that literature peter out and now we are getting a new wave of less empirical, more theoretical literature, or is the current discussion derived from that? [read post]
9 Aug 2019, 11:34 am
TM holder free riding/trolling: pressure on mark exclusions/defenses. [read post]
5 Apr 2014, 12:21 pm
1) Give district courts discretion to punish frivolous suit 2) Forcing patent holders to be more clear in their claims in Biosig v. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 6:00 am
Ebay v. [read post]
