Search for: "POWELL v. UNITED STATES" Results 401 - 420 of 836
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Aug 2014, 4:00 am by David Markus
Judge Wilson, joined by a visiting judge, issued this opinion in United States v. [read post]
24 Jul 2014, 9:01 pm by John Dean
United States (1971) and United States v. [read post]
23 Jul 2014, 1:49 am by rhapsodyinbooks
Justice Anthony Kennedy Today, Kennedy is frequently viewed as the Court’s swing vote on social issues and has consequently held special prominence in several politically-charged, highly anticipated 5 to 4 decisions, including the notorious Citizens United v. [read post]
23 Jun 2014, 8:31 am by Susan C. Morse
The Supreme Court on June 19 unanimously vacated and remanded an Eleventh Circuit per curiam decision in United States v. [read post]
3 May 2014, 7:01 am
A Sketchy Past In the wilderness of states without decanting statutes there is arguably a common law basis for decanting based on what may be the first decanting case in the United States, Phipps v. [read post]
9 Apr 2014, 7:37 pm by Ezra Rosser
Nakanishi, john a. powell, Maria Blanco, Howard Winant Indigenous Peoples: Response to the Periodic Report of the United States to the United Nations Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination Tribal Self-Government in the United States John Dossett When Affirmative Action Was White Ira Katznelson The Importance of Targeted Universalism john a. powell, Stephen Menendian & Jason Reece Implicit Bias A Forum – eds. [read post]
23 Mar 2014, 7:36 pm
    Procedural HistoryHemphill first filed suit against Johnson & Johnson (“J&J”) in the United States District Court for the District of Maryland in 1999, alleging that J&J’s Stayfree, Carefree, and Serenity sanitary napkins and adult incontinence products infringed claim 2 of United States Patent No. 4,557,720 (“the ’720 patent”). [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 9:01 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
As Justice Powell stated in 1980, and it still remains true, “this ‘means’ test has been virtually impossible to satisfy,” as Justice Powell said in Fullilove v. [read post]
25 Feb 2014, 4:16 pm
By Matthew Hinks The well-known "nexus" and "rough proportionality" tests from the United States Supreme Court's opinions in Nollan v. [read post]
21 Feb 2014, 6:59 am
We might also buy Justice Powell’s argument that the FTCA remedy, because of all the exemptions, “simply is not an adequate remedy. [read post]
14 Feb 2014, 9:35 am by Ronald Collins
Rehnquist (who clerked for Justice Jackson), to the ruling in National Federation of Independent Business v. [read post]
28 Jan 2014, 12:00 pm by Katrina Diaz
These limits are referred to as the “nexus” and “rough proportionality” standards set forth in the well-known United States Supreme Court cases of Nollan v. [read post]
19 Jan 2014, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
United States: Former wrestler Hulk Hogan has lost a claim for an injunction to restrain the publication of a sex tape by the gossip website Gawker. [read post]