Search for: "PROFESSORS OF SECOND AMENDMENT LAW" Results 401 - 420 of 4,891
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
25 Jan 2022, 5:27 pm by Howard Bashman
“Faith Can’t Abrogate a Contract; A California state court goes too far in a ruling against Scientology’s arbitration agreement”: Law professor Michael J. [read post]
11 Sep 2017, 11:33 pm by Steve Baird
In the meantime, here is my second installment on the important topic of Federal Trademark Registration, the First Amendment, and Freedom of Speech: Part II. [read post]
28 Nov 2022, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Smith ’67 Professor of Law and Faculty Co-Director of the Center for Firearms Law at Duke University Law School. [read post]
25 Apr 2022, 7:30 am by Guest Blogger
” (emphases added) Second, Professor Graber wrote: “Josh Blackman and Seth Barrett Tillman maintain that the persons responsible for the Fourteenth Amendment thought that only Congress could implement Section 3. [read post]
17 Dec 2010, 12:15 pm by Danielle Citron
Along with Patricia Bellia, of Notre Dame, I wrote an amicus brief for law professors prior to the 2007 decision, and have written law review articles (with Tricia) on the topic since. [read post]
18 Mar 2011, 1:42 pm by Lyle Denniston
Kerr, a George Washington University law professor in Washington, D.C. [read post]
Editor’s Note: John Olson is a founding partner of Gibson, Dunn & Crutcher LLP and a visiting professor at the Georgetown Law Center. [read post]
13 Sep 2011, 11:12 am by Richard Frank
My colleague, Berkeley Law Professor Eric Biber, has previously commented on one of the bills currently on Governor Brown’s desk. [read post]
3 Mar 2010, 8:03 am by Ashby Jones
At the McDonald argument, it seemed obvious that five or more justices will vote to apply the Second Amendment to the states. . . . [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 3:00 am by Peter A. Mahler
Horning Construction LLC, 12 Misc 3d 402 (Sup Ct Monroe County 2006), in which the court relied on Professor Moll's analysis of the impact of the 1999 amendments to the LLC Law on relations between minority and majority members of LLCs. [read post]
29 Jun 2010, 12:48 pm by Eugene Volokh - Guest
Eugene Volokh is a law professor at the University of California, Los Angeles. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 12:00 am
“In order to find either WikiLeaks/Julian Assange or the NYT liable, the government would need to prove two things — first that a law had been broken, and second that enforcement of the law was constitutional under the First Amendment,” Richards says. [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 2:45 pm by Morgan Weiland
As University of Maryland Professor of Law Frank Pasquale rightly suggested in a tweet about the Politico story: “Next up: internet behemoths will claim that a law requiring respect for adblocking requests infringes on their free speech rights #Sorrell. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 3:05 pm
FCC, No. 13-1124, Brief for Amici Curiae Law Professors in Support of Petitioner, available at http://bit.ly/MinorityTelevisionAmicus: This brief amicus curiae in support of petitioner Minority Television Project in Minority Television Project, Inc. v. [read post]
23 Apr 2014, 3:05 pm
FCC, No. 13-1124, Brief for Amici Curiae Law Professors in Support of Petitioner, available at http://bit.ly/MinorityTelevisionAmicus: This brief amicus curiae in support of petitioner Minority Television Project in Minority Television Project, Inc. v. [read post]
16 Mar 2009, 2:13 pm
"To date, the federal courts have not invalidated a single gun control law on the basis of the Second Amendment since Heller. [read post]