Search for: "Pace v. United States" Results 401 - 420 of 971
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
The Constitution’s Appointments Clause states that the president “shall nominate, and by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, shall appoint Ambassadors . . . and all other Officers of the United States, whose Appointments are not herein otherwise provided for, and which shall be established by Law. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 9:03 am by Errol Adams
Since the Stonewall Riots of 1969, which sparked the gay rights movement, there is much to be celebrated in the United States and more particularly in New York State. [read post]
12 Jun 2017, 10:32 am by Francisco Macías
  Among those limitations was interracial marriage. 1883—Pace v. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 7:27 pm by Josh Blackman
Rather, the only parties that could bring the claim are the alien’s associates (relative or organization) within the United States. [read post]
4 May 2017, 10:45 am
In late February, Aaron Gach was returning to the United States from Brussels. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 1:30 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
John's University School of LawKatherine Schostok, DePaul University College of LawAllison Winnike, University of Houston Law Center 5:00 – 7:00 PM Welcome Reception – Henson Atrium, Georgia State Law Friday, June 9, 20177:30 – 8:15 AM Registration & Breakfast – Henson Atrium, Georgia State Law 8:15 – 8:30 AM Opening Remarks – Ceremonial Courtroom, Georgia State LawWendy Hensel, Interim Dean and Professor of Law, Georgia… [read post]
11 Apr 2017, 11:09 am by Alyson Carney
POST WRITTEN BY: Daniela Parra (J.D. expected 2017, Elisabeth Haub School of Law at Pace University) SCOTUSblog is an “impartial, journalistic entity” which provides comprehensive coverage of the United States Supreme Court (“SCOTUS”). [read post]
8 Mar 2017, 1:19 pm by Lisa Daniels
Leibowitz then proposes a method by which the defense can destroy material obtained outside of discovery, while preserving any exculpatory or Brady material, by employing the framework used in United States v. [read post]
2 Mar 2017, 4:16 pm by INFORRM
Banning the use of confidential sources denies a core principle reflected in media ethics codes from around the world and flies in the face of the First Amendment to the United States constitution and rights to free speech. [read post]
21 Feb 2017, 4:00 am by Guest Blogger
As the late Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States Antonin Scalia once remarked, Marshall [the first black member of the U.S. [read post]
19 Feb 2017, 9:02 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Not necessarily.Rumors have been circulating that the new EO will apply the same criteria as EO 13769 but expressly exempt green card holders, student visa holders, and other people with substantial contacts with the United States. [read post]
12 Feb 2017, 9:29 pm by RegBlog
This drastic increase of more than 700 percent firmly secures women’s place as the fastest growing prison population and highlights the urgent need for a gender-responsive, trauma-informed approach to female incarceration in the United States. [read post]
9 Feb 2017, 6:04 pm by Edward A. Fallone
Tonight, the Ninth Circuit issued an unanimous ruling in State of Washington v. [read post]