Search for: "Pacer System" Results 401 - 420 of 920
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
6 Aug 2010, 3:09 pm by Todd Ito
The system also allows you to add tags and connect related cases. [read post]
23 Oct 2013, 1:58 am by Jon Gelman
Nationally the best system has been the Federal Court Electronic Filing System (EFS) along with the public access system PACER. [read post]
10 Mar 2014, 8:40 am
Access to court-issued documents will continue to be available via the Notice of Electronic Filing ("NEF") email system. [read post]
29 Nov 2013, 4:14 am
[The complaints are usually attached to the Notice of Appeal filed at the TTAB; other court papers may, of course, be found via PACER]. [read post]
28 Jul 2009, 2:13 pm
Courts' website just posted a news release indicating that the federal courts are going to try to a better job of protecting PIN information that would otherwise be accessible to the public through PACER. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 9:17 am by Ashby Jones
It’s the kind of motion we’d normally be inclined to scroll right over on PACER: a procedural motion that really has no bearing on the outcome of a case. [read post]
5 May 2011, 6:03 am by Kevin Miles
Government Printing Office (GPO) and the Federal Judiciary have launched a one-year pilot program to offer federal court decisions via Federal Digital System, FDsys.Through FDsys you are able to search, browse, access and download government documents.For now the courts participating in the pilot include:U.S. [read post]
19 Sep 2011, 5:57 am by sue.altmeyer@law.csuohio.edu
The conference voted to increase costs for PACER, the federal courts' electronic docket system, from 8 cents a page to 10 cents a page. [read post]
13 Nov 2013, 12:31 pm by lennyesq
Opinions are pulled nightly from the courts’ Case Management/Electronic Case Files (CM/ECF) systems and sent to the GPO, where they are posted on the FDsys website. [read post]
28 Apr 2010, 7:52 am
The opinion (available here) and order should be available on the PACER website soon under Docket No. 09-1100. [read post]
14 Sep 2011, 1:00 pm by Nathan Koppel
The Judicial Conference announced that the federal court system will not levy PACER fees on users who accrue $15 or less of PACER fees in a quarterly billing cycle. [read post]
4 Mar 2015, 9:08 am by Ron Coleman
 At the time, I wrote, “According to PACER, this litigation is still going strong. [read post]
10 Jan 2012, 8:02 pm by Steve Schultze
However, the Courts' current fee structure collects significantly more funds from users than the actual cost of running the PACER system. [read post]
26 Aug 2014, 2:45 pm by Joe Mullin
 Those five courts aren't compatible with the new PACER system. [read post]
19 Oct 2011, 10:20 am by Cornell Law Library
  The secure transfer of files to GPO from the AOUSC’s Case Management/Electronic Case Filing system (CM/ECF, which feeds PACER) maintains the chain of custody,  This allows GPO to authenticate the files with digital signatures. [read post]
16 Feb 2009, 6:16 am
Instead, there is Pacer, the government-run Public Access to Court Electronic Records system designed in the bygone days of screechy telephone modems. [read post]
25 Sep 2014, 11:55 am by NBlack
That’s why in August, even more criticism was levied toward PACER when it was announced that as part of a planned overhaul of the system’s architecture, entire categories of documents from five courts had been removed from the system. [read post]