Search for: "Paris v. United States"
Results 401 - 420
of 791
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Jan 2021, 6:00 am
United States .v Schultz, 333 F.3d 393 (2nd Cir. 2003); United States v. [read post]
20 Jan 2021, 6:00 am
United States .v Schultz, 333 F.3d 393 (2nd Cir. 2003); United States v. [read post]
15 Mar 2012, 2:53 am
In the meantime a big Katpat to Cathal Lane from Tomkins who sent a link to this seminal Irish case on compulsory licensing Allen and Hanburys Ltd. v. [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 9:05 pm
United States on individual due process rights in the era of artificial intelligence. [read post]
28 Jun 2015, 3:48 pm
Member States confirmed their strong opposition to reprisals against persons cooperating with the United Nations and its human rights mechanism and representatives. [read post]
15 Jun 2020, 4:29 am
Shareholder Derivative Claims Against Entities Controlled by Majority Shareholders Defeated by Doctrine of In Pari Delicto Rutigliano v Absolute Electrical Contracting of NY, Inc., 2020 NY Slip Op 31768(U) [Sup Ct NY County June 4, 2020], involves a dispute regarding the ownership and control of a unionized electrical contracting business (Absolute) from which the plaintiff one-third shareholder allegedly was frozen out by his fellow shareholders. [read post]
28 Nov 2019, 9:05 pm
Although the Trump Administration recently announced its withdrawal from the Paris Agreement, United States lawmakers took note of the report. [read post]
31 Oct 2011, 3:08 am
Agency (Law) » United States. [read post]
13 Mar 2019, 8:00 am
United States. [read post]
7 Jul 2010, 5:14 am
You can separately subscribe to the IP Think Tank Global Week in Review at the Subscribe page: http://thinkipstrategy.com/subscribe/ Highlights this week included: Biotechnology patents: Court of Justice of the EU decides against patent theory of Monsanto: Monsanto v Cefetra & Ors (BLOG@IP::JUR) (EPLAW) (IPKat) Prilosec / Losec (Omeprazole) - EU: General Court largely upholds European Commission decision in AstraZeneca v Commission (EPLAW) (IPKat) General An… [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 6:03 pm
Highlights this week included: Biotechnology patents: Court of Justice of the EU decides against patent theory of Monsanto: Monsanto v Cefetra & Ors (BLOG@IP::JUR) (EPLAW) (IPKat) Prilosec / Losec (Omeprazole) – EU: General Court largely upholds European Commission decision in AstraZeneca v Commission (EPLAW) (IPKat) General An overview of the ‘Health Impact Fund’ model for accessible medicines (Spicy IP) Pharma pay-and-procure symposium (IP… [read post]
19 Jun 2016, 4:05 pm
The press was united in horror this week, reacting to the news that Labour MP Jo Cox was murdered outside a constituency surgery. [read post]
23 Apr 2017, 8:14 am
. - Law), & Alain Pellet (Université Paris Nanterre - Law) have published The International Legal Order: Current Needs and Possible Responses: Essays in Honour of Djamchid Momtaz (Brill | Nijhoff 2017). [read post]
28 Jun 2017, 9:26 am
Google, 11/07970, Judgment (6 November 2013) (Tribunal de Grande Instance de Paris); Max Mosley v. [read post]
1 Dec 2023, 12:35 pm
Neglecting this international legal principle leads to an erosion ofnational sovereignty and identity, just as the terrorist attacks in Paris during November2015 and other attacks elsewhere illustrate the dangers of deterioration of European bordercontrols. [read post]
2 May 2022, 7:04 am
” Gorsuch devoted his concurring opinion in United States v. [read post]
12 Jul 2022, 2:29 am
Match Group has been named as a defendant in litigation relating to its billing and subscription practices filed by multiple California District Attorneys relating to such practices, People of State of California v. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 1:20 pm
The prosecution at the Guantanamo Bay military commissions filed a single paragraph notice on Wednesday indicating that he will appeal a military commissions judge’s decision to place an indefinite hold in United States v. al-Nashiri, the Miami Herald reports. [read post]
30 Jul 2014, 12:01 am
See United States v. [read post]
31 Aug 2012, 9:00 am
RUSK STATE HOSPITAL v. [read post]
