Search for: "Parks v. Georgia" Results 401 - 420 of 538
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
22 Mar 2011, 11:35 am by admin
  Hamtramck and Highland Park were at one time factory towns – and Hamtramck has the dubious distinction of the site of a terrible eminent domain for economic development land grab, Poletown v. [read post]
14 Feb 2016, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
On the same day Dingemans J gave judgment in Lokhova v Tymula ([2016] EWHC 225 (QB))(heard 26 and 27 January 2016). [read post]
17 Apr 2023, 5:50 am by INFORRM
 Last week in the courts On 4 April 2023, judgement on costs was handed down by Justice Murray in the case of Parkes v Hall and Earnshaw [2023] EWHC 794 (KB). [read post]
20 Nov 2016, 4:20 pm by INFORRM
Lisle-Mainwaring v Associated Newspapers 11 November 2016 (HHJ Parkes QC). [read post]
22 Nov 2012, 12:27 am by legalinformatics
Aaron Jay Reynolds Patterson, Georgia State University: Contemporary Legal Discourse and the Graeco-Roman Tradition: The 2009 OJ Simpson Kidnapping Trial Carlo A. [read post]
23 Jan 2017, 1:25 am by INFORRM
On 20 January 2017, Sir Davie Eady heard applications in the case of Daryanani -v- Ramnani. [read post]
13 Jul 2018, 11:46 am by Kevin
On June 28, the Georgia Court of Appeals filed an opinion in Wiggins v. [read post]
25 Apr 2009, 3:21 am
  The case is Northwest Austin Municipal Utility District v. [read post]
28 Jan 2019, 9:58 am by Kevin Kaufman
Georgia, Hawaii, and South Carolina legislatively decoupled from the inclusion of GILTI in the tax base. [read post]
5 Mar 2017, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
The Social Media Law Bulletion notes that, in the case of Palomino v. [read post]
22 Apr 2024, 1:06 am by INFORRM
Georgia Protests have broken out in Georgina in response to what has been dubbed the “Russian bill” due to its similarly to laws passed by President Putin in Russia. [read post]
15 Jan 2017, 4:17 pm by INFORRM
Peep Beep has also examined the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) judgement in the joint cases C‑203/15 Tele2 Sverige AB v Postoch telestyrelsen and C‑698/15 Secretary of State for the Home Department v Secretary of State for the Home Department. [read post]
10 Aug 2011, 4:04 pm by David Lat
Of the 1,400 people who have voted thus far in our reader poll, only 34 percent would vote “guilty” if they were jurors in the case of State v. [read post]