Search for: "Patel v. Patel"
Results 401 - 420
of 784
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Nov 2021, 5:21 am
The Federal Court’s decision in Kaira District Co-operative Milk Producers’ Union Limited v. [read post]
17 Nov 2021, 5:21 am
The Federal Court’s decision in Kaira District Co-operative Milk Producers’ Union Limited v. [read post]
29 Jun 2022, 12:15 am
XPT, Inc., 2022 WL 1400847 (citing Patel v. [read post]
16 Mar 2023, 6:00 am
In Louw v Patel, the general practitioner concerned had to weigh the urgency of attending to a patient requiring an appendectomy or another requiring transfer to a higher level of care for a vascular injury caused by a gunshot wound to the leg. [read post]
13 Jun 2010, 1:01 am
Patel v. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 5:47 am
Avi Schick and Kiran Patel preview the case for Slate. [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 2:37 pm
Patel and James Wyda 4. [read post]
14 Mar 2007, 5:18 pm
In Patel v. [read post]
1 Aug 2011, 6:51 am
Court of Appeal (Civil Division) Faith Stewart v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions [2011] EWCA Civ 907 (29 July 2011) Suckrajh, R (on the application of) v The Asylum & Immigration Tribunal & Anor [2011] EWCA Civ 938 (29 July 2011) Iqbal v Ahmed [2011] EWCA Civ 900 (29 July 2011) Hayes v Merseyside Police [2011] EWCA Civ 911 (29 July 2011) Austin & Ors v Miller Argent (South Wales) Ltd [2011] EWCA Civ 928 (29 July 2011) Modi & Anor… [read post]
21 Apr 2016, 7:02 am
Stanley v. [read post]
4 Nov 2019, 5:40 am
Patel v Secretary of State for the Home Department; Secretary of State for the Home Department v Shah, heard 7 May 2019. [read post]
20 Oct 2014, 7:51 am
Patel. [read post]
18 Sep 2013, 5:21 am
Discussing judicial precedent the Eighth Circuit explained: The only circuit court to address the question directly, see Patel v. [read post]
27 May 2012, 9:06 am
[1] Patel, V. and Kaufman, D.R. (2000) Clinical reasoning and biomedical knowledge: implications for teaching, in: J. [read post]
10 May 2019, 7:38 am
” Volb v. [read post]
5 Aug 2015, 10:06 am
Patel. [read post]
15 Sep 2021, 4:01 am
The complaint, as amplified by the plaintiffs’ evidentiary submissions in opposition to the defendants’ motion, contained only conclusory allegations, without any factual basis, that the defendants acted to deceive the court when submitting the Kamisher and Lovy affidavits in the prior action (see generally Patel v Gardens at Forest Hills Owners Corp., 181 AD3d 611, 613 [2020]). [read post]
27 Apr 2020, 4:12 pm
The Defence must be more than merely arguable – see ED & F Man Liquid Products v Patel [2003] EWCA Civ 472 at [8]. [read post]
19 Nov 2010, 1:48 am
Wilkins-Jones v. [read post]
8 Dec 2010, 5:28 pm
Gray v. [read post]
