Search for: "Pearson v. Pearson"
Results 401 - 420
of 764
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jul 2013, 7:36 am
At PrawfsBlawg, Cynthia Godsoe and Kim Pearson discuss last week’s decision in Adoptive Couple v. [read post]
5 Mar 2010, 11:48 am
See Pearson v. [read post]
22 Oct 2008, 11:28 am
To establish causation, a plaintiff must show that he or she would have prevailed in the underlying action, or would not have incurred any damages but for the attorney's negligence (see Rudolf v Shayne, Dachs, Stanisci, Corker & Sauer, 8 NY3d at 442; Davis v Klein, 88 NY2d 1008, 1009-1010; Lamanna v Pearson & Shapiro, 43 AD3d 1111; Cohen v Wallace & Minchenberg, 39 AD3d 691). [read post]
11 Feb 2013, 10:53 am
As reported, hectic lobbying is currently underway with John Makinson (CEO of Penguin International) and Khozem Merchant (President of the Pearson India Group), making representations of their views on the matter to Manish Tewari (I&B Minister). [read post]
6 Dec 2010, 6:02 am
Co. v Rafailov, 41 AD3d 603, 604; see also High Fashions Hair Cutters v Commercial Union Ins. [read post]
5 Oct 2011, 1:52 pm
Pearson: [This is an automatic appeal from a November 2003 judgment of death. [read post]
18 Jun 2018, 4:28 am
Since the judgment of divorce was vacated and the plaintiff was [*3]afforded an opportunity to retain new counsel and to conduct further discovery, the plaintiff cannot, under these circumstances, establish that she has sustained damages proximately caused by Hasin’s alleged negligent representation (see Katz v Herzfeld & Rubin, P.C., 48 AD3d 640, 641; Perks v Lauto & Garabedian, 306 AD2d 261, 262; Albin v Pearson, 289 AD2d 272,… [read post]
14 Dec 2014, 9:38 pm
The second precedent is Pearson v. [read post]
6 Jul 2010, 3:46 am
Ramcharan v Pariser, 20 AD3d 556, 557; Albin v Pearson, 289 AD2d 272). [read post]
8 Nov 2017, 7:40 am
Co. v. [read post]
26 Feb 2007, 9:55 am
NFP criminal opinions today (14): Gregory Pearson v. [read post]
7 Oct 2010, 6:18 am
Pearson Education Inc. [read post]
10 Jan 2021, 7:45 pm
In Still v. [read post]
10 Oct 2009, 5:09 am
It appears that the Botox suit is claiming free speech protections that are similar to those that are currently provided for dietary supplements under the questionable decision of Pearson and Shaw v. [read post]
1 Jun 2010, 2:12 pm
Citing the principles established in Pearson I (Pearson v. [read post]
9 Dec 2009, 10:19 am
In Pearson Education & Cengage Learning v. [read post]
18 Jan 2017, 5:54 am
Reese George V. [read post]
15 Aug 2011, 7:34 pm
Further, the Second Circuit has yet to decide Pearson v. [read post]
11 Jun 2020, 7:00 am
Courts of Appeals hold; and (2) whether the Supreme Court should reconsider Pearson v. [read post]
27 Jun 2008, 8:38 am
Pearson Education Inc. [read post]
