Search for: "People v Case" Results 401 - 420 of 57,533
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 May 2024, 1:28 pm by NARF
Unequal land: Towards full recognition of Indigenous people’s religious rights. [read post]
8 May 2024, 8:15 am by David Pocklington
In 2015 we posted “Spiritual influence” and elections in relation to a report in The Times on the Election Court hearing of the challenge to the re-election of Lutfur Rahman as Mayor of the London Borough of Tower Hamlets and a subsequent note on the decision in Erlam & Ors v Rahman & Anor [2015] EWHC (QB) 1215. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
RosadoIndex No. 152743/21 Appeal No. 1230 Case No. 2022-02719[*1]IntegrateNYC, Inc., et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants,vThe State of New York et al., Defendants-Respondents, Parents Defending Education, Intervenor Defendant-Respondent. [read post]
8 May 2024, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
RosadoIndex No. 152743/21 Appeal No. 1230 Case No. 2022-02719[*1]IntegrateNYC, Inc., et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants,vThe State of New York et al., Defendants-Respondents, Parents Defending Education, Intervenor Defendant-Respondent. [read post]
7 May 2024, 2:19 pm by Ilya Somin
The Attorney General argues that Crandall and Edwards are distinguishable because the travel restrictions at issue in those cases operated categorically, regardless of the reasons for which people were traveling. [read post]
7 May 2024, 9:32 am by vforberger
As a result, only a few people who had representation have managed to challenge these administrative concealment penalties for Lost Wages Assistance. [read post]
7 May 2024, 7:43 am by centerforartlaw
Source: USPTO  Rothschild moved to dismiss the complaint under the Second Circuit’s Rogers v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 6:43 am by Second Circuit Civil Rights Blog
In this case, the New York Court of Appeals chips away a little further on eyewitness testimony and holds that the criminal conviction needs to be vacated.The case is People v. [read post]
7 May 2024, 5:00 am by Written on behalf of Peter McSherry
Dismissed Employee Asserts that She Was Terminated Because of Her Age The case of Hall v Zurn Industries Limited involved an employee (“CH”) who began working for Monteco Ltd. on January 18, 2008 as the part-time Director of Human Resources. [read post]
7 May 2024, 5:00 am by Written on behalf of Peter McSherry
Dismissed Employee Asserts that She Was Terminated Because of Her Age The case of Hall v Zurn Industries Limited involved an employee (“CH”) who began working for Monteco Ltd. on January 18, 2008 as the part-time Director of Human Resources. [read post]
Contesting the state’s segregationist policy, they took their case (Parker v. [read post]
6 May 2024, 9:01 pm by renholding
The FTC argues that the proposed acquisition would result in “substantial effects on employment wages, benefits and conditions for people who work for or seek employment from the parties and their brands. [read post]