Search for: "People v Condon" Results 401 - 420 of 420
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Sep 2011, 8:14 pm by KC Johnson
And the Durham brief doesn’t mention that at least one of her “physical descriptions” from the March 16 meeting didn’t match any player on the lacrosse team, while those descriptions also didn’t even remotely resemble at least two of the people ultimately charged. [read post]
10 Nov 2008, 10:39 pm
In this case, it was Hirst v UK (No2). [read post]
5 May 2021, 12:11 pm by Evelyn Douek
Any definitive decision would have made lots of people very unhappy. [read post]
1 Sep 2019, 7:31 pm by Omar Ha-Redeye
The recent arbitration decision in Acadia University v Acadia University Faculty Association is instructive in this regard. [read post]
2 Oct 2012, 4:06 pm by lawmrh
” But has greater access translated into the delivery of “enormously valuable legal services to ordinary people at low cost” as Bolick maintains? [read post]
5 Jan 2008, 2:12 pm
Cannon to right of them, Cannon to left of them, Cannon in front of them Volley’d & thunder’d; Storm’d at with shot and shell, Boldly they rode and well, Into the jaws of Death, Into the mouth of Hell Rode the six hundred [Blawg Review 141 was published slightly early after email exchange between myself and Ed of Blawg Review] Welcome Bienvenu Wilkommen Benvenuto Bienvenido to Blawg Review 141. [read post]
2 Jan 2011, 6:38 am by Charon QC
My ex-wife used to roll her eyes when I said, as one does, non haec in foedera veni [Lord Radcliffe in Davis Contractors Ltd v. [read post]
22 Sep 2010, 1:11 pm
Furthermore, CIL is violated whenever a State, “as a matter of state policy,… practices, encourages or condones (a) genocide, (b) slavery… (c) the murder or causing the disappearance of individuals, (d) torture or other cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment… or (g) a consistent pattern of gross violations of internationally recognized human rights. [read post]
6 Oct 2011, 6:02 pm by Contributor
The lack of legislative safeguards means that SLAPPs can transform public participation in the democratic process into a risky activity that attracts liability, even when condoned by the legislature. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 9:40 am by Roy Black
  UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MASSACHUSETTS Criminal Action No. 20-10177-PBS UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. [read post]
29 Mar 2017, 5:09 am by SHG
Many people talk a good game on law and politics. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 6:53 pm by W.F. Casey Ebsary, Jr.
Nothing in this Ordinance is intended to promote or condone the sale, distribution, possession or use of marijuana in violation of any applicable state or federal law. [read post]
7 Mar 2017, 6:53 pm by W.F. Casey Ebsary, Jr.
Nothing in this Ordinance is intended to promote or condone the sale, distribution, possession or use of marijuana in violation of any applicable state or federal law. [read post]