Search for: "People v Court" Results 401 - 420 of 61,226
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Nov 2013, 12:56 pm
 Which is what the California Supreme Court says here. [read post]
10 Feb 2015, 6:02 pm by Gerard N. Magliocca
Two recent stories in the The Wall Street Journal raise significant questions about whether any of the named plaintiffs in King v. [read post]
25 Jun 2013, 4:07 am by Timothy P. Flynn, Esq.
First, the Michigan Supreme Court ruled in People v McQueen that a marijuana dispensary was not afforded the protections of the medical marijuana act when taking a percentage of the patient-to-patient transactions. [read post]
16 Jan 2015, 1:02 pm by Howard Friedman
Supreme Court today granted certiorari in four same-sex marriage cases from the Sixth Circuit: Obergefell v. [read post]
14 Feb 2018, 3:45 am by INFORRM
In Haaretz.com et al v Mitchell Goldhar (SCC case no. 37202), the Supreme Court of Canada is asked to decide whether the court in Ontario has jurisdiction to hear a defamation claim arising from an article widely published in Israel, but read online by a number of people in Canada. [read post]
10 Mar 2017, 12:52 pm
The Court of Appeal today grants a victory to people who want to post confidential (negative) reviews of their employer. [read post]
26 Nov 2019, 1:12 pm
Virtually identical to the two cases here is the high court's unanimous decision in Knowles v. [read post]
19 Mar 2008, 7:00 am
However, the court should draw a line in the sand and send it back to the legislator to fix. [read post]
15 Dec 2011, 1:38 pm by Edward X. Clinton, Jr.
Appellate court reverses Juan Rivera murder conviction - Lake County News-Sun:I would not be surprised to see some form of ethics complaint against the prosecutors who brought this flawed prosecution. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 10:04 am
Interflora British Unit v Marks and Spencer PLC Flowers Direct Online Limited [2009] EWHC 1095 (Ch). [read post]
16 Jul 2010, 1:42 pm by Paul Ohm
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit, the court that sets federal law for Alabama, Florida, and Georgia, ruled in an opinion in a case called Rehberg v. [read post]
12 Jun 2019, 11:20 am
  What you are really pleading is "not guilty by reason of insanity," and the People are agreeing. [read post]
11 Apr 2019, 2:00 am by DONALD SCARINCI
Majority Decision inBucklew v Precythe A sharply-divided Supreme Court affirmed. [read post]