Search for: "People v Pump" Results 401 - 414 of 414
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Nov 2007, 11:44 pm
Gun Case Legal Times The Supreme Court announced Tuesday it will take up the case of District of Columbia v. [read post]
13 Oct 2007, 7:52 am
I must, of course, leave this rather long post with a bit of Shakespeare - Henry V: O noble English! [read post]
5 Oct 2007, 1:24 am
Bukowski of Stevens & Lee, were just doing their job as they represented Capital Blue Cross in Grider v. [read post]
31 Aug 2007, 6:05 am
Part of the problem, no doubt is that confusing decision of the Supreme Court in Philip Morris v. [read post]
29 Aug 2007, 1:17 pm
Section 466 of the Penal Code criminalizes the possession of burglary tools, which is defined by the statute to expressly include (but not be limited to) the following: "a picklock, crow, keybit, crowbar, screwdriver, vise grip pliers, water-pump pliers, slidehammer, slim jim, tension bar, lock pick gun, tubular lock pick, floor-safe door puller, master key, [and] ceramic or porcelain spark plug chips or pieces. [read post]
1 Jun 2007, 7:30 pm
On July 2, 1976, in deciding the case of Gregg v Georgia, the Supreme Court legalised capital punishment after a decade-long moratorium on executions. [read post]
14 Feb 2007, 3:46 am
Officers are well aware that people do not live in "individual, separate, hermetically sealed residences," but live with other people and often move from one residence to another. [read post]
8 Feb 2007, 8:01 am by Liskow & Lewis
 An UA consists of densely settled territory with a population of at least 50,000 people. [read post]
1 Jan 2007, 8:20 pm
The case shows up in a database used by lawyers, but as Confidential v. [read post]
7 Dec 2006, 12:04 am
The judges restated their positions in additional detail on Tuesday -- only this time Bybee was writing in dissent as Graber penned the 8-7 majority opinion in a strikingly contentious en banc case, in Doe v. [read post]
15 Jul 2006, 7:32 am
But, like a lot of conservatives, he was so irritated by the Supreme Court's decision in Hamdan v. [read post]