Search for: "People v. Angell"
Results 401 - 420
of 2,542
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Dec 2007, 6:28 am
Particularly when read in combination with the Ninth Amendment's declaration of the retained rights of the people, these twin assertions of popular sovereignty established a rule of strict construction - the very interpretive principle rejected by John Marshall in McCulloch v. [read post]
2 Jul 2010, 2:47 pm
Other Superior Court judges named Wednesday are: Mark V. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 3:17 am
” The 1926 Supreme Court decision in The City of Euclid v. [read post]
22 May 2008, 12:59 pm
On Monday, Jennifer Pizer, senior counsel in the Los Angeles office of the Lambda Legal Defense and Education Fund, filed a supplemental brief with the high court suggesting that its ruling in the marriage case completely destroys her opponents' arguments in North Coast Women's Care Medical Group v. [read post]
7 Jul 2008, 11:57 am
In Crawford v. [read post]
4 Oct 2013, 9:23 am
NSAFirst Unitarian Church of Los Angeles v. [read post]
20 Mar 2013, 5:00 am
” (People ex rel. [read post]
3 Jul 2014, 7:28 am
In Harris v. [read post]
3 Nov 2008, 7:50 pm
- Wyeth v. [read post]
28 Aug 2014, 11:59 am
But I'm also pretty sure that since the L.A. riots, people deliberately started calling the place its new name. [read post]
2 Jul 2012, 11:01 am
City of Los Angeles (1991) 54 Cal.3d 1, 17. [read post]
25 May 2007, 4:24 am
Caveat emptor (enter at your own risk).Opinion in the consolidated casePerfect 10 v. [read post]
22 Jul 2020, 6:25 am
The first witness was Mr Isaac Baruch, an old friend of Mr Depp’s who lived rent free in the neighbouring penthouse apartment in Los Angeles. [read post]
6 Nov 2020, 7:26 am
In California v. [read post]
25 Mar 2014, 4:00 am
Code § 3370.1 (stats. 1972, ch. 1084, p. 2021), cited in People v. [read post]
25 Jan 2010, 6:00 am
A recent California Court of Appeals case (People v. [read post]
10 Mar 2009, 10:31 am
My partner Mark travels back and forth between our office and Los Angeles a great deal. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 8:47 am
In the recent case of People v Baugh, decided on February 9, 2018, the First District Court of Appeal in California found that exactly such a bat constitutes a weapon and is illegal to possess under Penal Code Section 22210. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 8:47 am
In the recent case of People v Baugh, decided on February 9, 2018, the First District Court of Appeal in California found that exactly such a bat constitutes a weapon and is illegal to possess under Penal Code Section 22210. [read post]
17 May 2013, 9:30 pm
Levenson (Loyola Law School, Los Angeles) reviews The People's Courts: Pursuing Judicial Independence in America, by Jed Handelsman Shugerman; Mónica Pinto (University of Buenos Aires Law School) reviews The Human Rights Culture: A Study in History and Context, by Lawrence M. [read post]
