Search for: "People v. Barnett"
Results 401 - 420
of 554
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Aug 2011, 4:30 am
Illinois v. [read post]
8 Aug 2011, 8:21 am
” Alden v. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 1:38 pm
Barnett, in each of these circuits.) [read post]
31 Jul 2011, 12:37 pm
[V]oters show they are fairly cynical about Democratic politicians’ stands. [read post]
29 Jul 2011, 7:12 am
See Kelly v. [read post]
18 Jul 2011, 12:26 am
Whilst Dominic Carman, writing in the Guardian, purports to outline some of Leveson’s flaws, the appointment of a judge to preside over the Inquiry has led Joshua Rozenberg to write that “when people can no longer trust the press, police or politicians, only a judge will do. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 11:08 pm
Barnett, Was the Right to Keep and Bear Arms Conditioned on Service in an Organized Militia? [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 8:05 pm
Politics gives people incentives to make innovative constitutional arguments. [read post]
30 Jun 2011, 11:00 am
One year later, the Due Process challenge was upheld 5–4 in McDonald v. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 8:31 pm
See, e.g., United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2011, 8:56 am
One needn't expect more, I suppose, but it's not exactly high-order journalism -- more a skillful use of the ctrl-V function. [read post]
13 May 2011, 11:59 am
What Congress may not do under the Commerce Clause is explained in United States v. [read post]
12 May 2011, 11:23 am
To teach the material, law professors have to come up with all sorts of creative hypotheticals that just don’t often come up in real criminal prosecutions: People who commit crimes while sleepwalking, under hypnosis, and the like. [read post]
8 May 2011, 7:01 pm
In re: People v. [read post]
8 May 2011, 8:10 am
(Eugene Volokh) I’ve heard quite a bit in the last few days about Doe v. [read post]
8 May 2011, 6:04 am
“Bush v. [read post]
20 Apr 2011, 10:00 pm
Justice Blake considered the relevant principles to be applied in relation to the PSEDs, as summarised in R(Boyejo & Ors) v Barnett LBC and Smith v Portsmouth CC [2009] EWHC (Admin) 755. [read post]
15 Apr 2011, 6:02 am
Aren’t there a bunch of plaintiffs out there suing Eli Lilly because its anti-schizophrenia drug, Zyprexa supposedly causes diabetes – at least in obese people who would probably contract the disease anyway? [read post]
5 Mar 2011, 4:56 pm
The Individual Mandate, Sovereignty, and the Ends of Good Government: A Reply to Professor Randy Barnett Patrick McKinley Brennan Villanova University School of Law University of Pennsylvania Law Review, 2011 Abstract:Randy Barnett has recently argued that the individual mandate is unconstitutional because it is an improper regulation under the Necessary and Proper Clause (in conjunction with the Commerce Clause) because it improperly "commandeers" the people and… [read post]
1 Mar 2011, 8:54 am
Wickard v. [read post]
