Search for: "People v. Edge"
Results 401 - 420
of 1,287
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
18 Mar 2017, 12:53 pm
I suggest they are actually double-edged. [read post]
8 Dec 2009, 11:05 am
[Here is where a discussion of Diamond v. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 7:39 am
Plaintiffs faced with the prospect of these harms might choose not to litigate: People who were sexually assaulted, for instance, might be reluctant to continue with their lawsuits once pseudonymity is denied; likewise for people who have been libeled, or who have been pretextually fired by their employers. [read post]
3 Jun 2008, 7:20 am
Campbell v. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 4:18 am
Rees and Glossip v. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 3:14 am
The Supreme Court's decision in Snyder v. [read post]
6 Feb 2015, 9:28 am
Sheff: question is ex ante costs of rigor v. ex post costs of resolving conflicts; reasonable people disagree. [read post]
17 Apr 2014, 12:00 am
Verizon v. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 10:21 am
It is general "good character" evidence that Bower is really a nice guy when he is not slaughtering multiple people. [read post]
31 Jan 2007, 7:31 am
A little bit of personal trivia -- I was the second seat on the first potential death penalty case in New York after reinstatement, The People v. [read post]
6 Oct 2022, 10:00 am
The case is Novak v. [read post]
22 May 2012, 12:08 pm
& Burberry Group, PLC v. [read post]
14 Aug 2007, 10:32 am
& Cedar Creek Wildlife Project, Inc. v. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 5:30 am
(daytondui.com) Are the Standardized Field Sobriety Tests Fair to Fatter People? [read post]
16 Nov 2006, 10:07 pm
Jesse V. [read post]
16 Jul 2009, 10:00 am
(yawn).Corley v. [read post]
22 Feb 2021, 11:46 am
Edge cases: makeup, assemblages (Oasis cover photo shoot case), carved ice. [read post]
8 Jul 2015, 7:17 am
(The court cites the 2011 CJ Products v. [read post]
21 Sep 2010, 10:00 pm
Ten Reasons Why You Should Teach Here — And Three Why You Shouldn't (v. 4.0) 1. [read post]
2 Apr 2017, 4:37 am
The Second Circuit sucked some of the wind out of those sails in Christiansen v. [read post]
