Search for: "People v. Heller"
Results 401 - 420
of 736
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
27 Apr 2022, 12:31 pm
In the decade since Heller and McDonald, countless cases have turned on a foundational question: how much danger does the weapon pose? [read post]
14 Oct 2020, 4:54 am
Since the issue in Kanter involved guns, and since so many people hate guns rather than the people who use them illegally to harm others, it both raises a question as well as taints the point. [read post]
6 Oct 2020, 4:00 am
For an example of the project, check out our latest episodes (SCC decision of Uber v Heller) below: [Note: This is the decision of the Majority. [read post]
6 Jan 2009, 9:47 pm
Heller, a majority of the U.S. [read post]
1 Jun 2016, 9:52 am
Heller, which extended the protections of the Second Amendment, as “a terrible decision. [read post]
25 Nov 2007, 4:16 pm
As a practical matter on the Court, the outcome in D.C. v. [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 10:40 pm
" Drummond v. [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 10:42 am
But in District of Columbia v. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 2:29 pm
But at least listen when I say this: There are lots of people, and even lots of law students, outside the bubble. [read post]
4 Jul 2022, 9:01 pm
Heller decision making clear that especially dangerous weapons may be regulated especially. [read post]
11 Oct 2011, 5:23 am
Our first topic of the week is Florence v. [read post]
22 Jul 2024, 6:36 pm
The Second Circuit in Antonyuk v. [read post]
9 Feb 2025, 7:31 pm
On January 30, the Fifth Circuit decided Reese v. [read post]
20 Nov 2019, 7:36 am
In one sense, the stakes in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
19 Feb 2018, 7:32 am
In District of Columbia v. [read post]
29 May 2018, 8:28 am
Heller. [read post]
30 Aug 2023, 12:55 pm
The opinion is today's dissent from denial of rehearing en banc in U.S. v. [read post]
2 Apr 2009, 2:10 pm
At para. 62 he endorsed the enumeration of factors in assessing relative degrees of fault set out by the Alberta Court of Appeal in Heller v. [read post]
17 Feb 2025, 8:27 pm
That infringes on the right of the people to keep and bear firearms that fire suppressed rounds. [read post]
9 Jul 2011, 11:37 pm
Romer v. [read post]
