Search for: "People v. Jefferson"
Results 401 - 420
of 828
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jan 2022, 12:03 pm
[v].) [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 5:41 am
Dicey (legislative omnipotence), Thomas Jefferson (departmentalism and active popular sovereignty that does not go dormant in non-Ackermanian moments), James Madison (a system of checks and balances reduced to a short code), or John Marshall (judicial supremacy based on an instrument that did not say a word about judicial supremacy when he wrote Marbury and continued silent on that point when his successors affixed each of their signatures to Aaron v. [read post]
17 Sep 2007, 4:12 am
Writing to Jefferson after the Convention Adams revealed, "[e]lections, my dear sir, I look at with terror. [read post]
11 Jul 2023, 4:19 am
If the view that diversity is malarkey crosses the line, what of the view that white people should be castrated or Asians should be denied entry into Harvard or Thomas Jefferson High? [read post]
17 Nov 2022, 8:00 am
Additionally, Judge Seeger then said the courts are not bound to follow decisions of equal or inferior courts, citing People v. [read post]
8 Dec 2020, 4:06 am
(Pamela Samuelson’s Commentary on UMG v Augusto and Vernor v Autodesk) Vernor v Autodesk (EFF Amicus Brief in Key Case re First Sale and Contracts, Following UMG v Augusto) MDY v Blizzard (Justia) A Mixed Ninth Circuit Ruling in MDY v Blizzard: WoW Buyers Are Not Owners – But Glider Users Are not Copyright Infringers (EFF’s Commentary on MDY v Blizzard) Capitol Records v ReDigi (Wikipedia) Court’s… [read post]
7 Aug 2020, 6:57 am
The remaining category of American religious-liberty controversies involves exemptions for religious exercise and accommodations for religious people. [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 3:47 pm
Even Tom Jefferson didn’t pull that one off. [read post]
1 Jun 2018, 8:28 am
Who knows what people are thinking? [read post]
6 Oct 2021, 3:31 pm
King v. [read post]
29 May 2014, 10:50 am
After the Convention, once all was said and done, he wrote again to Jefferson: A check on the States appears to me necessary 1. to prevent encroachments on the General authority. 2. to prevent instability and injustice in the legislation of the States. [read post]
24 Jul 2008, 1:05 am
Jefferson, who, besides his other advantages for remarking the operation of the government, was himself the chief magistrate of it. [read post]
7 May 2020, 6:30 am
” Roberts v. [read post]
18 Feb 2013, 9:07 am
Certified EMS, Inc. v. [read post]
21 Nov 2009, 3:52 am
Some might think that Atkins v. [read post]
5 Mar 2014, 2:50 pm
District Court judge found it unconstitutional as applied to some Somali pirates, in United States v. [read post]
24 Jan 2010, 5:54 pm
The case, Danielle Johnson, Individually, et al. v. [read post]
5 Mar 2007, 8:45 pm
In Lawrence v. [read post]
21 Sep 2015, 1:36 pm
Kent Higgins, et al. v. [read post]
5 Dec 2011, 10:30 am
The following are the people, with their former addresses, excluded as of October 20 and October 27, 2010. [read post]
