Search for: "People v. Juvenile Court" Results 401 - 420 of 1,131
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
29 Jan 2018, 3:57 pm by Kent Scheidegger
Supreme Court has made its ban on mandatory life-without-parole for juvenile offenders retroactive, extending it to people who were already sentenced before it ruled that such punishments are unconstitutional. [read post]
6 Jan 2010, 3:16 am by SHG
These people included children. [read post]
28 Apr 2015, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
In the case of Aitken v DPP ([2015] EWHC 1079 (Admin)) the Divisional Court dismissed a former editor’s appeal against a conviction for publishing a story which breached an anonymity order under section 39 of the Children and Young Persons Act 1933. [read post]
4 Feb 2013, 6:34 am by The Charge
  But, criminal restitution essentially establishes a debt under the auspices of criminal courts which have the ability to jail people...for failing to pay a debt...to a private party...whose counsel was provided by the state...and which is not eligible for relief from the bankruptcy courts. [read post]
16 May 2018, 1:57 pm
  He committed serious crimes (albeit as a juvenile), and the district court looked at the evidence and sent the guy to prison forever. [read post]
18 Nov 2008, 10:46 am
  The second paragraph of the court’s decision in State v. [read post]
7 Jul 2015, 8:38 am by Marc Climaco
Now that the ACLU has helped win the freedom to marry nationwide through Obergefell v. [read post]
9 Feb 2013, 6:23 pm
In a recent Colorado case - People v Lorenzo Brooks - the defendant's conviction's conviction for failure to register as a sex offender was overturned because his out of state Texas conviction had no Colorado sex crime equivalent. [read post]
15 Oct 2019, 4:00 am by Edith Roberts
This morning the Supreme Court will hear 80 minutes of argument in five cases consolidated under Financial Oversight Board for Puerto Rico v. [read post]
6 Aug 2022, 9:49 am by Eric Goldman
Manheim Township School District * More Teenagers Mistakenly Think “Private” Chat Conversations Will Remain Private–People v. [read post]