Search for: "People v. Li" Results 401 - 420 of 2,760
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jul 2016, 5:37 am by INFORRM
Though WO’s public comments meant that he opened himself up to the possibility of being heavily criticised, his writing were not abusive or insulting to Jewish people. [read post]
19 Feb 2014, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
It doesn’t make the stop unlawful if there is a subsidiary purpose – “killing two birds with one stone” – but the permitted purpose must be the “true and dominant purpose behind the act” (R v Southwark Crown Court ex p. [read post]
5 Dec 2009, 11:23 am
" The problem is that the evidence didn't merely make it "look like" Tenenbaum lied. [read post]
30 Apr 2010, 7:31 am by charonqc
For too long, you’ve been lied to by politicians saying they can sort out all your problems. [read post]
28 Aug 2011, 6:32 am
The case most commonly referred to by the Colorado family law community for this standard is People v. [read post]
11 Sep 2017, 4:09 pm by INFORRM
The decision of the Grand Chamber of the Court of Human Rights handed down last week in Bărbulescu v Romania ([2017] ECHR 754) is a surprising one that acts as a warning to employers. [read post]