Search for: "People v. Morales" Results 401 - 420 of 3,929
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Feb 2014, 3:26 pm
 The transcript of the decision is not yet available, but Kevin has been promised a copy and will post it when he gets it.What is the moral of the story? [read post]
24 Jul 2024, 9:48 am by centerforartlaw
At this point, restitution efforts transferred to a political and diplomatic level, with members of the Italian Ministry for Cultural and Environmental Heritage and of the Italian Ministry of Foreign Affairs contacting the Getty Museum in 1982, 1989 and 1995, urging the restitution of the bronze on moral and ethical grounds. [read post]
28 Aug 2024, 4:28 pm by INFORRM
In particular he complained that the national courts interpreted his statements – which he claims were critical remarks on numerous topical issues – as being extremist and insulting towards people of faith. [read post]
13 Nov 2020, 3:30 pm by Guest Blogger
”[4]Supporters of segregation made “appeals to natural law, divine law, and unchanging moral principles in [their] opposition” to the CRA[5] and argued “there were decent, sincere people on both sides. [read post]
29 Oct 2023, 11:26 am by Eric Goldman
In contrast, the RNC emails people who subscribed to their email lists. [read post]
15 Feb 2007, 1:25 am
For that proposition, the court cited its own post-Lawrence decision in Lofton v. [read post]
18 Jun 2017, 9:01 pm by Ronald D. Rotunda
”The humility we learn is that even very intelligent people can be very wrong about essential moral truths. [read post]
27 May 2018, 2:35 pm by Ilya Somin
The answer, I think, is that it is wrong to punish people for morally arbitrary characteristics that are beyond their control. [read post]
18 Feb 2011, 9:05 am by James Grimmelmann, guest-blogging
People have come up with all sorts of schemes to make the world a better place by pulling up stakes and starting over again somewhere out from beyond Leviathan’s reach. [read post]
10 Oct 2018, 4:23 pm by INFORRM
The court based its findings on, among other evidence, two expert reports and it found that Terentyev had negatively influenced public opinion “with the aim of inciting social hatred and enmity, escalating social conflict and controversy in society and awakening base instincts in people”, calling for the “physical extermination” of police officers by ordinary people. [read post]
11 Dec 2010, 3:30 am by SHG
  None of the sexy stuff that people routinely associate with criminal law. [read post]