Search for: "People v. Novo" Results 401 - 420 of 503
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jun 2018, 1:25 pm by Eugene Volokh
And to me it is one of the most despicable pieces of rhetoric that people can use to—to use their religion to hurt others. [read post]
3 Aug 2011, 12:00 pm by Bexis
 More recently, the Supreme Court in Riegel v. [read post]
21 Feb 2011, 4:07 pm by INFORRM
(Professor Brown notes the English Court of Appeal admitted this in Loutchansky v Times Newspapers Ltd (Nos 2 – 5) [2002] 2 WLR 640 at 653.) [read post]
17 May 2017, 9:30 pm by Christopher Walker
Supreme Court recognized in Motor Vehicle Manufacturers Association v. [read post]
17 Dec 2008, 7:16 pm
Quarterman, No. 05-20350 Denial of federal habeas petition is reversed and remanded for a de novo hearing of appellant's ineffective assistance of counsel claims, as the state habeas trial court's findings do not survive review where the appellate court did not specify which facts it accepted and which it rejected in denying the petition. [read post]
5 Jan 2022, 7:16 am
  A portion of the decision lamented the dearth of specifics offered by the People's Republic of China's State Secret Law with respect to determining whether information produced is protected and what liability would attach to that disclosure. [read post]
26 Dec 2012, 4:15 pm by Tracy Coenen
Although Judge Sammartino quoted Penal Code section 327 and cited to the California case People v. [read post]