Search for: "People v. Phillips" Results 401 - 420 of 914
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 Feb 2016, 12:11 pm by Eugene Volokh
But if not (and if the plaintiff is a public figure and the article is on a matter of public concern), then the Supreme Court’s decision in New York Times Co. v. [read post]
23 Feb 2016, 2:17 pm by Dennis Crouch
Pulse Electronics, Inc., et al. (14-1513); and Stryker Corporation, et al. v. [read post]
15 Feb 2016, 8:49 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
” His accolades and honors are too numerous to mention; they include: Arguing Oklahoma Tax Commission v. [read post]
26 Jan 2016, 4:35 am by INFORRM
 In Brand v Berki [2014] EWHC 2979 (QB), a masseuse was held to have harassed celebrity couple, Russell Brand and Jemima Khan, by accusing them of serious criminal offending in the media, in emails to numerous people, and in an online petition. [read post]
4 Jan 2016, 10:17 am by Andy
For those who would like to read an in-depth analysis of the case, I can recommend an article in the European Intellectual Property Review written by someone called Jeremy Phillips (who ever he is). [read post]
28 Dec 2015, 2:51 am by Ben
In Europe, The Court of Justice of the European Union ruled that the consent of a copyright holder does not cover the distribution of an object incorporating a work where that object has been altered after its initial marketing to such an extent that it constitutes a new reproduction of that work (Case C‑419/13, Art & Allposters International BV v Stichting Pictoright) with Eleonora opining that the decision means that that there is no such thing as a general principle of… [read post]
23 Dec 2015, 5:29 am by INFORRM
The use of investigatory powers is vital to locate missing people, to place a suspect at the scene of a crime or to identify who was in contact with whom. [read post]