Search for: "People v. Race"
Results 401 - 420
of 5,002
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Jun 2023, 7:49 am
SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED STATES Syllabus STUDENTS FOR FAIR ADMISSIONS, INC. v. [read post]
22 May 2013, 2:18 pm
The Supreme Court is expected to issue a decision soon in Fisher v. [read post]
5 Oct 2022, 5:16 am
In Hirabayashi v. [read post]
13 Jul 2022, 4:30 am
Colorado, Timbs v. [read post]
14 Jul 2011, 10:48 am
The following is an essay for our symposium on Arizona v. [read post]
6 Dec 2009, 6:48 pm
And as if that wasn't enough, many of the people in gover [read post]
29 Jun 2023, 5:14 pm
Near the end of the majority opinion of Chief Justice Roberts in Students for Fair Admissions v. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 6:51 am
This is the case where the people of Michigan — after the Supreme Court approved of the University of Michigan Law School's use of race in admissions — amended their constitution to require that the state "not discriminate against, or grant preferential treatment to, any individual or group on the basis of race, sex, color, ethnicity, or national origin." [read post]
15 Sep 2014, 5:07 pm
[1] Lopez Torres v. [read post]
1 Aug 2023, 10:48 am
American Civil Liberties Union NetChoice v. [read post]
26 Dec 2016, 11:16 am
But “harassment” has become a vastly broader term than that: Simply wearing a costume that offends people based on race is, according to the university, “harassment. [read post]
25 Mar 2013, 2:03 pm
Predicting the result in Hollingsworth v. [read post]
11 May 2022, 1:09 pm
Among other things, some serious people, such as several law professors in this Vox symposium, are suggesting that the Court may overrule Loving v. [read post]
15 Aug 2016, 9:49 am
And there is some argument that the decision in Shelley v. [read post]
24 Jan 2017, 12:39 pm
BNSF Railway Company (Race Discrimination - Wrongful Employment Discharge)State Courts Bulletinhttp://www.narf.org/nill/bulletins/state/2016state.html People ex rel. [read post]
8 Aug 2014, 6:05 pm
The People have the initial burden of going forward to show the “lack of any undue suggestiveness” (People v Chipp, 75 NY2d 327, 335 [1990]; People v Ortiz, 90 NY2d 533 [1997]). [read post]
16 Dec 2011, 12:01 pm
For a few moments, my mind started to race. [read post]
8 Jan 2016, 8:35 am
“[T]here is no reason . . . we should pass a law such as this applicable to colored people and not apply it to white people,” insisted Senator James Wilson Grimes of Iowa. [read post]
21 Sep 2009, 2:16 pm
Briscoe v. [read post]
21 Mar 2019, 9:45 am
Today, we filed Center for Media Justice v. [read post]
